Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Citrix 1Y0-403 Exam - Topic 11 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-403 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 11
[All 1Y0-403 Questions]

Scenario: A Citrix Architect is designing a new Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment. Citrix Provisioning (PVS) has been selected for image management. The PVS vDisk store requires high fault tolerance and the ability to support dual drive failure.

Which RAID level could the architect use for the PVS vDisk store?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Hoa at Aug 04, 2023, 11:39 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nan
6 months ago
RAID 1 just mirrors, not enough for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
6 months ago
Wait, RAID 0? That can't be right, can it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
7 months ago
RAID 5 is still okay, but not for dual failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
7 months ago
Totally agree, RAID 6 offers that extra protection!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
7 months ago
RAID 6 is the best choice for dual drive failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
7 months ago
I definitely remember that RAID 0 offers no redundancy at all, so it can't be the right choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question before, and I think RAID 1 is more about mirroring, so it wouldn't fit the dual failure requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like RAID 5 might be a good option too. It has redundancy, but I can't recall if it can handle two failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
8 months ago
I remember discussing RAID levels in class, and I think RAID 6 is the one that supports dual drive failure, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about project closure documentation. I'm pretty confident the End Project Report is the right answer here, as it would be the appropriate place to record any final resource costs before the project is closed.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review my notes on the differences between waterfall and agile to figure out which step would be most impacted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
8 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the steps carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
1 year ago
I'd choose RAID 6 just to be on the safe side. I mean, who wants to be the one to explain to the boss why the PVS vDisk store went down because of a double drive failure?
upvoted 0 times
Myra
11 months ago
User 4: RAID 6 it is then, can't risk losing the vDisk store data with dual drive failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
11 months ago
User 3: I think RAID 6 is the way to go for the PVS vDisk store, better safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 months ago
User 2: RAID 5 might not be enough for high fault tolerance, so RAID 6 seems like the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
12 months ago
User 1: I agree, RAID 6 provides the best fault tolerance for dual drive failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonny
1 year ago
RAID 1 is a solid option, but it only protects against a single drive failure. Wouldn't it be nice to have that extra drive to fall back on?
upvoted 0 times
Buddy
11 months ago
User 3: RAID 5 could also be an option, but RAID 6 offers better protection against multiple drive failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
11 months ago
User 2: I agree, RAID 6 provides redundancy and performance benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
11 months ago
User 1: RAID 6 would be the best choice for high fault tolerance and dual drive failure support.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
James
1 year ago
RAID 0? Are you kidding me? That's the worst possible choice for this scenario. Talk about putting all your eggs in one basket!
upvoted 0 times
Pedro
11 months ago
User 4: RAID 5 could also work for high fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
11 months ago
User 3: RAID 6 would be a better option for dual drive failure support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
11 months ago
User 2: I agree, RAID 0 doesn't provide any fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
11 months ago
User 1: RAID 0? That's a terrible choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
11 months ago
Cortney: Yeah, RAID 0 is definitely not the right choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
1 year ago
User 3: RAID 1 is also a good option for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
1 year ago
User 2: RAID 6 is even better, it can support dual drive failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 year ago
User 1: RAID 5 would be a good choice for high fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleonora
1 year ago
RAID 5 could work, but RAID 6 is the safer option. Why take the risk of a single drive failure when you can have the extra protection?
upvoted 0 times
Christiane
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tess
1 year ago
RAID 6 is the clear choice here. It provides the high fault tolerance and dual drive failure support that the PVS vDisk store requires.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but RAID 5 could also be a good option for the PVS vDisk store.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
1 year ago
I agree with Karan, RAID 6 provides high fault tolerance and can support dual drive failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
1 year ago
I think the architect could use RAID 6 for the PVS vDisk store.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel