New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix 1Y0-341 Exam - Topic 4 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-341 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 4
[All 1Y0-341 Questions]

Scenario: A Citrix Engineer has established protections for web applications using Citrix Web App Firewall. One of the application owners is concerned that some negative traffic is passing through to the application servers. The owner wants confirmation that Citrix Web App Firewall is blocking negative traffic. Which CLI command can the engineer use to display statistics on a per-protection basis for the enabled protections?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Alton
3 months ago
B is the go-to for checking protections, trust me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure B is the best option? I thought it was A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
3 months ago
Not so sure about that, C could also be useful for profiles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
4 months ago
Definitely agree with B, it’s the most relevant one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
4 months ago
I think the right command is B. It shows policy stats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
4 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of checking the profile stats, but I can't recall the exact command for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like "stat appfw signature" might show some useful info too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I believe the correct command is "stat appfw policy ."
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
5 months ago
I think the command we're looking for is related to the policy, but I can't remember if it's "policy" or "profile."
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
This is a good test of our Citrix Web App Firewall knowledge. I'm confident I can identify the correct command to use to get the statistics the application owner is requesting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Does "per-protection basis" mean we need to look at individual policies or the overall profile? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
5 months ago
Okay, the key here is that we need to display statistics on a per-protection basis. I'm pretty sure the "stat appfw policy" command is the one we want to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the specific command to use here. I'll need to review my notes on Citrix Web App Firewall to make sure I choose the right option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Citrix Web App Firewall commands. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. First, NAT on R2 using a standard ACL. Then NTP server on R1 and client on R2. DHCP server on R1 with the exclusion range. And finally, SSH access on R3 with the RSA and bit requirements. I think I can do this, just need to take it slow and double-check my work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
5 months ago
The key here is understanding the DOM hierarchy and which node types can be children of Element nodes. I'm confident I can work this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
5 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of how shared calendars work in this software. I'll carefully consider each option and try to apply my knowledge of the program's interface to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
2 years ago
So confusing! I'm leaning towards B after some doubts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
2 years ago
I went with A. I believe the policy label would show comprehensive stats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 years ago
Honestly, I wasn't sure. But I picked D, hoping it gives detailed info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
2 years ago
I chose C because it seemed logical to check the profile stats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
2 years ago
Yeah, I had to think hard. I went for B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
2 years ago
Seems tricky, right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel