Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Citrix 1Y0-241 Exam - Topic 6 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-241 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 6
[All 1Y0-241 Questions]

Scenario: For security reasons, a Citrix Administrator needs to block access to multiple URLs.

The administrator executes the below commands:

> add policy patset BAD_URL

> bind policy patset BAD_URL badurl1.mylab.lab -index 11 -charset ASCII

> bind policy patset BAD_URL badurl2.mylab.lab -index 10 -charset ASCII

Which final two commands should the administrator execute to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Oretha at Jul 24, 2023, 03:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-241 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Florinda
6 months ago
A and D both seem good, but I’m leaning towards D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
6 months ago
Definitely going with D, it makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
7 months ago
Wait, can you really use 'RESET'? Seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
7 months ago
I think B is better since it uses CONTAINS_ANY.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
7 months ago
Option A looks solid for blocking those URLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
7 months ago
I thought the policy should include CONTAINS_ANY for multiple URLs, so maybe option B is the way to go, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
7 months ago
I feel like option A might be right because it uses DROP, which seems more appropriate for blocking access, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
8 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to bind a policy globally, but I can't recall the exact command structure for the DNS_REQ_OVERRIDE type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
8 months ago
I think the responder policy needs to use the correct syntax for blocking, but I'm not sure if it should be DROP or RESET.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between policing and marking. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
8 months ago
Hmm, these revenue red flag questions always trip me up. I know it's something about unusual transactions, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
8 months ago
I think I've got this. If I calculate the required bandwidth based on the given information, the correct answer should be clear. Time to put my networking skills to the test!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
8 months ago
Whoa, this is a tough one. I'm not super familiar with network forensics, so I'll have to rely on my general security knowledge to make an educated guess here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with option D. I mean, come on, 'DNS_REQ_OVERRIDE'? That's just pure cybersecurity gold right there. Plus, it's the only one that has the word 'RESET' in it, and everyone knows that's the secret to all computer problems.
upvoted 0 times
Tamera
11 months ago
Yeah, option D seems like the best choice. 'DNS_REQ_OVERRIDE' sounds like a strong security measure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
11 months ago
I agree, 'RESET' must be the magic word for fixing things. Let's go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
11 months ago
Option D sounds like the way to go. 'DNS_REQ_OVERRIDE' does sound pretty secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loreta
1 year ago
Option B looks like the way to go. I mean, 'CONTAINS_ANY' just sounds like it's going to cover all the bases, you know? Plus, who doesn't love a good 'RESET' command?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with option A. I mean, who doesn't love a good 'DNS.REQ.QUESTION.DOMAIN.CONTAINS' command? It just rolls off the tongue, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Option D looks like it might be the way to go, since it includes the 'DNS_REQ_OVERRIDE' type, which sounds like it would be more effective for blocking the URLs.
upvoted 0 times
Peggie
12 months ago
Yes, Option D with 'DNS_REQ_OVERRIDE' looks like the correct way to go for blocking those URLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
12 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like the most effective choice for blocking those URLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
1 year ago
Option D looks like the best choice. It includes 'DNS_REQ_OVERRIDE' which seems like the right type for blocking URLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Narcisa
1 year ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I think I'll go with option B - it seems to be the most comprehensive approach to blocking the bad URLs.
upvoted 0 times
Tenesha
12 months ago
Yeah, option B looks like the right way to go to block those bad URLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
12 months ago
I think option A might also work, but option B seems more thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
1 year ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice to block those URLs effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dallas
1 year ago
Why do you think D is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 year ago
Why do you think D is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel