Citrix 1Y0-241 Exam - Topic 4 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-241 exam

Question #: 97
Topic #: 4

Scenario: A Citrix Administrator needs to configure persistence on a global server load balancing (GSLB) vServer to which a service is bound. Service must continue to handle requests from the client even after it is disabled manually -- accepting new requests or connections only to honor persistence. After a configured period of time, no new requests or connections are directed to the service and all existing connections are closed.

To achieve these requirements, which parameter can the administrator configure while disabling the service?

APersistence threshold

BPersistence time-Out

CWait time

DRequest threshold

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-adc/current-release/load-balancing/load-balancing-advanced-settings/graceful-shutdown.html

by Lourdes at Apr 04, 2025, 03:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-241 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tracey

6 months ago

Wait, are we sure this is how it works? Sounds tricky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dallas

6 months ago

Yeah, that makes sense!

upvoted 0 times

...

Chandra

6 months ago

Definitely B, it's the right choice!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ona

6 months ago

Not so sure about that. Could be A too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

6 months ago

I think it's B, Persistence time-Out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mable

7 months ago

I’m not confident, but Request threshold doesn’t seem right for this scenario. It feels more like it relates to limiting requests rather than managing persistence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

7 months ago

I’m leaning towards Wait time because it sounds like it would control how long the service waits before closing connections. But I need to double-check my notes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnee

7 months ago

I remember a similar question about load balancing where we had to manage sessions. I feel like Persistence threshold could be relevant here, but I could be mixing it up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

7 months ago

I think the answer might be Persistence time-Out, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems to fit the scenario of handling existing connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabra

7 months ago

I'm leaning towards Persistence time-Out as well. The question mentions the service must continue to handle requests for a configured period of time, so that option seems to fit the best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

8 months ago

Persistence time-Out is definitely the right answer here. The question clearly states that the administrator needs to configure a parameter to handle existing requests for a period of time after disabling the service, and that's exactly what Persistence time-Out does.

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if Persistence threshold or Request threshold would also work for this scenario. I'll need to think it through a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebecka

8 months ago

I think the answer is Persistence time-Out. That option seems to match the requirement of continuing to handle existing requests for a configured period of time after the service is disabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulina

1 year ago

Option B definitely makes the most sense. Gotta love Citrix for giving us these handy features to keep the users happy, even when things aren't working perfectly.

upvoted 0 times

Matthew

12 months ago

Agreed, it really helps to maintain user satisfaction even during service disruptions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nakisha

12 months ago

Exactly, it's great that Citrix has these features to ensure a smooth user experience.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noelia

1 year ago

B) Persistence time-Out

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

1 year ago

Hah, I bet the admin is wondering if they can just set the persistence time-out to 'forever' and go on vacation. Though I suppose that would defeat the purpose of the feature.

upvoted 0 times

Charlene

12 months ago

A: Exactly, but eventually no new requests or connections would be directed to the service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

1 year ago

B: Yeah, that sounds right. It would allow existing connections to be honored for a period of time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elina

1 year ago

A: I think the administrator can configure the Persistence time-Out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luke

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think it could also be C) Wait time. It sounds like it could be related to handling requests after disabling the service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

1 year ago

I agree with Marget. Setting a time-out for persistence makes sense in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

1 year ago

I agree, B is the way to go. Persistence time-out is the key to maintaining that client-service relationship even when the service is disabled.

upvoted 0 times

Ivan

1 year ago

Agustin: Yes, and after a configured period of time, no new requests or connections will be directed to the service and all existing connections will be closed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ines

1 year ago

User 3: So, the service will accept new requests or connections only to honor persistence, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Agustin

1 year ago

User 2: I agree, that parameter will ensure the service continues to handle requests from the client even after being disabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arletta

1 year ago

User 1: I think the key parameter to configure while disabling the service is B) Persistence time-Out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marget

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) Persistence time-Out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

1 year ago

Option B, persistence time-out, seems like the right choice here. It allows the service to continue handling existing connections even after it's disabled, and after the configured time, it will close all connections.

upvoted 0 times

Lashandra

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It allows the service to continue handling existing connections before closing them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myrtie

1 year ago

User 1: I think option B, persistence time-out, is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...