Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 500-445 Exam - Topic 8 Question 14 Discussion

What is the limit of concurrent agents per application server?
A) 400
B) 600
C) 1200
D) 1800

Cisco 500-445 Exam - Topic 8 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-445 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 8
[All 500-445 Questions]

What is the limit of concurrent agents per application server?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To receive chat messages while registering the application for chat API integration, you must register the webhooks callback URL. The webhooks callback URL is used to receive chat messages from the chat API and can be used to trigger an action or response when a chat message is received. The other options are not required for chat API integration.


by Albina at Apr 22, 2023, 03:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-445 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Blondell
10 months ago
Wait, is it really 600? That surprises me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
10 months ago
400 seems too low for modern servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
10 months ago
I heard it's actually 1800, but I'm not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
11 months ago
Definitely not 1200, that's way too high!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
11 months ago
I think it's 600.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
11 months ago
I recall reading that the limit can vary, but 1800 seems too high for most applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
11 months ago
I’m really uncertain about this one. I thought it was lower, maybe around 400?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I want to say it was 1200.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
I think I remember something about 600 being a common limit, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the "salted for retirement" part of the requirements. I'm not sure what that means exactly. I'll need to think through that part more carefully before deciding on the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. I know the basis usually carries over in a gift, but I'm wondering if the fair market value at the time of the gift might matter here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
11 months ago
Based on the user requirements, a corporate-owned laptop or notebook seems like the best fit. It provides the necessary functionality while aligning with the organization's preference for managed devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the FQDN part. Do we need to do anything special with that, or is the DNS entry the main thing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
1 year ago
The answer is clearly B, 600 agents. Any more and the server would probably start smoking like my uncle's old car.
upvoted 0 times
Jules
1 year ago
Definitely, we don't want any servers smoking!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
1 year ago
Yeah, my uncle's old car couldn't handle much more than that either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
1 year ago
I agree, B) 600 seems like the safe limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
1 year ago
D) 1800
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
1 year ago
C) 1200
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
1 year ago
B) 600
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
1 year ago
A) 400
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noah
1 year ago
I'm going with option C, 1200 agents. It's a nice round number, like the number of calories I consume during a Netflix binge.
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B, 600 agents, might be too low. We should aim higher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
1 year ago
I agree with you, option C seems like a reasonable choice. Let's go with 1200 agents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
1 year ago
I think option D, 1800 agents, is more likely. We need to be prepared for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 year ago
I'm going with option C, 1200 agents. It's a nice round number, like the number of calories I consume during a Netflix binge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
1 year ago
I'm going with option D, 1800 agents. Better to have more capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I'll go with option B, 600 agents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
1 year ago
I agree, 1200 agents seems like a good limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 year ago
I think option C, 1200 agents, sounds reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
400 agents? That's like trying to herd cats - good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
1 year ago
Hmm, 1800 concurrent agents per application server? That's more than the number of people in my family reunion!
upvoted 0 times
Lore
1 year ago
B) 600
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
1 year ago
A) 400
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edison
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe we should review the documentation to confirm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
1 year ago
I believe it's 1800 concurrent agents per application server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
1 year ago
I think the limit is 1200 concurrent agents per application server.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel