Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 500-444 Exam - Topic 8 Question 9 Discussion

What are the Active and Configured agent counts for the 2K deployment model?
B) 2K / 8K and D) 2K/12K
A) 2K/4K
C) 2K/10K

Cisco 500-444 Exam - Topic 8 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-444 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 8
[All 500-444 Questions]

What are the Active and Configured agent counts for the 2K deployment model?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Kristofer at Jan 08, 2023, 01:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-444 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Roxane
10 months ago
Not sure about 2K/10K, feels off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
10 months ago
Totally with you on 2K/4K!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
10 months ago
Wait, is it really 2K/12K? That seems high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
11 months ago
Definitely 2K/4K!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
11 months ago
I think it's 2K/8K.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
11 months ago
I definitely recall 2K/12K being an option in some practice questions, but I can't remember if it was correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought it was 2K/10K, but now I’m second-guessing myself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like 2K/8K was mentioned a lot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
11 months ago
I think the Active and Configured agent counts were something like 2K and 4K, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
11 months ago
Based on the description, Workforce Management seems like the logical choice to replace the spreadsheet-based scheduling. It's specifically designed for managing agent schedules and availability, so that should be the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
11 months ago
I think the Cleanup Utility is the right choice here. It's designed to free up space in the external database, which is exactly the issue we're facing with the persistent chat feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
11 months ago
This is a good one. The key is that Randy must be customarily engaged away from the employer's place of business, so the answer is C. I'm confident in that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The key is to use techniques that can dynamically change the attack signature, like a reverse telnet shell or a dynamic return address. That should help evade both the signature and anomaly detection approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
11 months ago
Okay, let me see. The question is asking about determining who should be consulted and what roles they should have. That sounds like it's about stakeholder identification, so I'm thinking the Stakeholder List technique might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
1 year ago
I've got a feeling that option B is the way to go. After all, 8K is a nice, round number. What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option B as well. 8K seems like a reasonable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
1 year ago
I agree, 8K does sound like a nice, round number. Let's go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 year ago
I'm not so sure about option B. Maybe we should consider the other options as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
1 year ago
I think option B is a good choice too. 8K sounds like a solid number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
1 year ago
User 4: Let's go with option B and see how it goes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
User 3: I'm not so sure, maybe we should consider the other options as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, 8K does sound like a nice, round number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, option B seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, 8K does sound like a good number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
1 year ago
User 1: I think option B is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 year ago
User 1: I think option B is a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maurine
1 year ago
Wait, are we talking about the number of agents or the number of agents divided by the number of kittens? I'm so confused right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
1 year ago
2K/10K? Really? That doesn't seem quite right. I'm going to have to double-check my notes on this.
upvoted 0 times
Leatha
1 year ago
Yeah, I remember it being 2K/8K as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
1 year ago
I think it's 2K/8K actually.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Golda
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be C) 2K/10K. Can someone explain why the answer is B) instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Maybe I should have paid more attention in class when they were talking about deployment models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
1 year ago
I agree with Marya, because in the 2K deployment model, the Active and Configured agent counts are usually 2K for Active and 8K for Configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) 2K / 8K.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 year ago
I think the active and configured agent counts for the 2K deployment model are 2K/8K. Option B seems to be the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Graham
1 year ago
Great, so we all think the answer is 2K/8K then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 year ago
That makes sense. 2K/8K does seem to be the most likely option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
1 year ago
Yes, I agree. Option B, 2K/8K, seems to be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
I believe the active and configured agent counts for the 2K deployment model are 2K/8K.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel