Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-444 Exam - Topic 7 Question 16 Discussion

Which two claim rules will be added to specify the claims sent from ADFS to Cisco Identity Service as part of a successful SAML assertion in PCCE? (Choose two.)
A) sAMAccountName - Logon names maintained for backward compatibility and D) Unspecified - For the Incoming name ID format and E) uid - For Identifying the authenticated user in the claim sent to the applications
B) user_principal - For Identifying the authentication realm of the user in the assertion sent to Cisco Identity Service.
C) E-Mail Address - For the Outgoing claim type

Cisco 500-444 Exam - Topic 7 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-444 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 7
[All 500-444 Questions]

Which two claim rules will be added to specify the claims sent from ADFS to Cisco Identity Service as part of a successful SAML assertion in PCCE? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Marylin
9 months ago
Definitely A and B, can't believe that's even a question!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
10 months ago
Wait, why would they use uid instead of sAMAccountName?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
10 months ago
A and E seem like the right choices to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
10 months ago
I think C is also important, though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
11 months ago
I feel like E-Mail Address could be relevant, but it seems more like an outgoing claim type rather than what we need for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the user_principal option. I think it relates to the authentication realm, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to identify claim types for SAML assertions. I feel like uid might be a good choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
11 months ago
I think the asAMAccountName is definitely one of the claim rules we need, but I'm not sure about the second one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this! The "increase(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents" would be reported under the operating activities section of the cash flow statement. That's where the changes in cash and cash-like items are shown.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
11 months ago
I've used that third-party app before, and it worked well for extracting metadata. That might be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by all these zypper options. I don't use it that often, so I'm not sure which one is the right one for listing patches. I'll have to guess on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
11 months ago
I think the answer is C. MAC seems like the best option to resist forgery and prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky situation. I'd want to carefully analyze the changes to the business process and see how much of the existing solution can be reused. Replacing everything from scratch seems like overkill if parts of the current solution are still relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answers are C) E-Mail Address and D) Unspecified. After all, who doesn't love a good 'Unspecified' claim? It's the perfect catch-all for all those pesky user details we can't be bothered to specify.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
1 year ago
Wait, there's a claim rule called 'Unspecified'? That's the most creative name I've ever heard. I wonder if it's a secret ninja claim that only the elite SAML ninjas know about.
upvoted 0 times
Glenna
1 year ago
User 3: 'sAMAccountName' and 'user_principal' are crucial for specifying claims sent from ADFS to Cisco Identity Service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
1 year ago
User 2: I think 'uid' is important too, it identifies the authenticated user in the claim sent to applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, 'Unspecified' does sound mysterious. Maybe it's a hidden gem in the claim rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Enola
1 year ago
I'm going to go with B) user_principal and E) uid, but I have to admit, I'm just guessing here. Maybe I should have read the SAML documentation more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Fairy
1 year ago
User1: Next time, let's make sure to review the SAML documentation to be more certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
1 year ago
User2: Yeah, those seem like the most relevant options for specifying claims in the SAML assertion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
1 year ago
User1: I think you're on the right track with B) user_principal and E) uid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
James
1 year ago
Hmm, this question is a bit tricky. I'm going to guess B) user_principal and E) uid, but I'm not completely confident. Maybe I should have paid more attention in class.
upvoted 0 times
Berry
1 year ago
User1: Let's go with those and see if we got it right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
1 year ago
User2: Yeah, those seem like the most logical choices for the claim rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
1 year ago
User1: I think you're on the right track with B) user_principal and E) uid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delila
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the correct answers, but I think A) sAMAccountName and C) E-Mail Address sound like reasonable choices for claims that could be sent to Cisco Identity Service.
upvoted 0 times
Benton
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that one, but E) uid seems important for identifying the authenticated user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
1 year ago
What about B) user_principal for identifying the authentication realm?
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 year ago
I agree, C) E-Mail Address could also be useful for outgoing claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
1 year ago
I think A) sAMAccountName is a good choice for identifying the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 year ago
That could work too, but I'm not sure about D) Unspecified for the incoming name ID format.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
1 year ago
What about B) user_principal for identifying the authentication realm of the user?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
1 year ago
I agree, and C) E-Mail Address could also be useful for specifying the outgoing claim type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
1 year ago
I think A) sAMAccountName is a good choice for identifying the user in the assertion.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delpha
1 year ago
Exactly, sAMAccountName for backward compatibility and uid for identifying the authenticated user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
1 year ago
I agree with you, those two seem like the most relevant ones for the SAML assertion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
1 year ago
I think the claim rules sAMAccountName and uid will be added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
1 year ago
Exactly, sAMAccountName for backward compatibility and uid for identifying the authenticated user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 year ago
I think the correct answers are B) user_principal and E) uid. The user_principal claim identifies the authentication realm of the user, and the uid claim identifies the authenticated user in the claim sent to the applications.
upvoted 0 times
Alease
1 year ago
Great, those two claim rules will help specify the claims sent from ADFS to Cisco Identity Service in a successful SAML assertion in PCCE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 year ago
So, the correct answers are B) user_principal and E) uid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
1 year ago
Yes, and the uid claim is also necessary for identifying the authenticated user in the claim sent to the applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
1 year ago
I agree, the user_principal claim is important for identifying the authentication realm of the user.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
James
1 year ago
I agree with you, those two seem like the most relevant ones for the SAML assertion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
1 year ago
I think the claim rules sAMAccountName and uid will be added.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel