Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-635 Exam - Topic 15 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-635 exam

Question #: 64
Topic #: 15

[All 300-635 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Which action fixes the code to access a child managed object?

ADelete line 2.

BChange dnQuery to classQuery in line 1.

CMove line 2 to the last line.

DChange parent to children in line 2.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Ronnie at Apr 28, 2024, 05:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-635 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Linsey

9 months ago

Moving line 2 sounds like a risky move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

9 months ago

Definitely not A, that would break it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mohammad

10 months ago

Wait, are we sure line 2 needs to change?

upvoted 0 times

...

Clarence

10 months ago

Nah, I believe it's option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

10 months ago

I think option B is the right fix!

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

10 months ago

I feel like changing parent to children in line 2 might make sense, but I need to double-check if that’s the correct terminology for this context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delila

11 months ago

I’m a bit confused about line 2. Moving it to the last line seems like it could work, but I can't recall if that’s the standard approach for child objects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindy

11 months ago

This question feels familiar! I practiced a similar one where we had to adjust the query to access related objects. I wonder if changing dnQuery to classQuery is the right move here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katina

11 months ago

I think I remember something about accessing child objects, but I'm not sure if it's about changing the query type or the line order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawanna

11 months ago

I'm not sure about this. I'll need to review the material on managed objects and see if I can spot the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nadine

11 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The solution seems straightforward if you understand the underlying concepts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearly

11 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to understand how to properly access a child managed object. Let me double-check the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the question. I'll need to think through the code and the possible solutions step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

11 months ago

This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the code and the options to figure out the right fix.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

11 months ago

I think Azure Data Box is the way to go. It should allow us to quickly transfer the large database without relying on the slow internet connection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

11 months ago

Ah, I see what they're getting at. Focusing on one library and optimizing for that specific one is probably the way to go, rather than mixing and matching. I'll mark that as my choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gene

11 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky integral. I'll need to think through the steps carefully to solve this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doretha

2 years ago

Also, moving the line might just mess up the order. I really think D is it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

2 years ago

Hmm, deleting line 2 sounds too simple. I doubt it's the right fix.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

2 years ago

Yeah, but what about deleting line 2? Could that work?

upvoted 0 times

...

Doretha

2 years ago

I'm leaning towards D, changing parent to children. Just makes sense for accessing a child object.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

2 years ago

Agreed. Any thoughts on the answer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

2 years ago

Seriously, this question is tricky.

upvoted 0 times

...