Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-615 Exam - Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

The external routes fail to propagate to leaf switches in Cisco ACI fabric Which two actions resolve the issue? (Choose two.)
A) Enable the VTEP pool in the fabric and C) Specify the spine nodes as route reflectors
B) Assign an MP-BGP AS number to the fabric.
D) Associate the correct contract to the L30ut.
E) Configure an MP-BGP area.

Cisco 300-615 Exam - Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 4
[All 300-615 Questions]

The external routes fail to propagate to leaf switches in Cisco ACI fabric Which two actions resolve the issue? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Nickolas at Mar 19, 2024, 09:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-615 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Myra
9 months ago
Wait, you have to configure an MP-BGP area? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
9 months ago
Agree, specifying spine nodes as route reflectors makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
10 months ago
Not sure about that, I thought route reflectors were optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
10 months ago
I think assigning an MP-BGP AS number is crucial too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
10 months ago
Definitely need to enable the VTEP pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think associating the correct contract to the L30ut was mentioned as a potential fix. Not sure if it applies here, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
11 months ago
I feel like assigning an MP-BGP AS number could be relevant here, but I can't recall if it directly affects route propagation to leaf switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
11 months ago
I remember something about route reflectors being important in ACI. Maybe specifying the spine nodes as route reflectors is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
11 months ago
I think enabling the VTEP pool might be one of the answers, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems like it could help with the external routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
11 months ago
Configuring an MP-BGP area could also be a solution, but I'm not as familiar with that aspect of the ACI fabric. I'll make a note to research that option further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the L3Out contract association. I'll need to review my ACI troubleshooting notes to make sure I have that part right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
11 months ago
Ah, I think I've seen this issue before. Specifying the spine nodes as route reflectors should help propagate the external routes to the leaf switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronica
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I'm pretty sure the VTEP pool and MP-BGP AS number are related to the ACI fabric configuration, so those might be good places to start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully to make sure I understand the underlying networking concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I know that Global Search is used to query content, and Salesforce CMS is the content management system, so the setting that needs to be turned on is likely related to connecting the two. I'll carefully consider each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
11 months ago
I've seen this type of problem before. My money's on the pool members being configured with the wrong port. That would explain why the users can't connect through the virtual server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
11 months ago
Improving order-promising info feels right because it directly impacts service levels, but I wonder if there's something to be said for delivery times as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Business goals, needs, and requirements are all related but at different levels of abstraction. Option B looks like the best description of that relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
Alright, let's think this through. B and D seem like the most logical choices to me. Although, I have to admit, the 'VTEP pool' in option A does sound kinda fun. Maybe I'll try that one just for kicks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 year ago
Ha, I bet the person who wrote this question was trying to trick us. 'Propagate to leaf switches'? More like 'propagate to the cafeteria' am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
1 year ago
C) Specify the spine nodes as route reflectors
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 year ago
Yeah, it does sound a bit tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
1 year ago
B) Assign an MP-BGP AS number to the fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 year ago
A) Enable the VTEP pool in the fabric
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Doug
1 year ago
Hold up, why do we need to configure an MP-BGP area? That seems like overkill for a simple routing problem. I'd stick with the more straightforward options, like B and D.
upvoted 0 times
Janessa
1 year ago
I think specifying the spine nodes as route reflectors is crucial for proper route propagation. Options C and E could be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
1 year ago
Enabling the VTEP pool in the fabric might also help with the routing issue. So, options A and D could be good choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
1 year ago
I agree, configuring an MP-BGP area does seem unnecessary. I would go with options B and D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micheline
1 year ago
I'm not so sure about that. Shouldn't we also specify the spine nodes as route reflectors? That's what option C suggests, and it sounds like it could help with the propagation issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
1 year ago
I believe specifying the spine nodes as route reflectors could be another solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 year ago
I agree with Mona. Assigning an MP-BGP AS number to the fabric might also resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the correct answers are B and D. Assigning an MP-BGP AS number to the fabric and associating the correct contract to the L3Out should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Nina
1 year ago
Exactly, those two actions should help propagate the routes to the leaf switches in the Cisco ACI fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 year ago
Got it, so B and D are the correct answers to resolve the issue with external routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
1 year ago
Yes, that's one of the correct actions. We also need to associate the correct contract to the L3Out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
1 year ago
I agree, assigning an MP-BGP AS number to the fabric is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mona
1 year ago
I think enabling the VTEP pool in the fabric could help.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel