Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-615 Exam - Topic 10 Question 78 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.A network engineer is implementing an RBAC on the Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch. The role called Host A fails to clear LACP counters on the port channel 20. Which configuration resolves the issue?
B) Delete rule 3 and create new rule 3 to allow the permit command.
A) Permit rule number 3 and read-write L3 operation.
C) Change the sequence of rule 2 and rule 3.
D) Delete rule 2 and create a new rule 4

Cisco 300-615 Exam - Topic 10 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 10
[All 300-615 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A network engineer is implementing an RBAC on the Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch. The role called Host A fails to clear LACP counters on the port channel 20. Which configuration resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Celeste at Dec 10, 2023, 02:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-615 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jacqueline
9 months ago
Definitely not D, that won't resolve the LACP issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
10 months ago
Changing rule sequences won't help here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
10 months ago
Wait, can deleting rules really fix this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
10 months ago
I agree, option B seems right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
10 months ago
Rule 3 needs to allow the permit command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
10 months ago
I feel like deleting rule 2 might be too drastic. I need to think about how that would affect other permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
11 months ago
I think permitting rule 3 could work, but I can't recall if it specifically applies to LACP counters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
11 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to adjust rules for LACP. I think changing the sequence might not be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
11 months ago
I remember something about RBAC configurations, but I'm not sure if deleting rule 3 is the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
11 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'm pretty confident that option B, deleting rule 3 and creating a new one, is the correct solution to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. I'll need to analyze the current configuration and see how the rules are set up, then determine which change would allow the necessary permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the role-based access control aspect. I'll need to make sure I understand the RBAC concepts before trying to solve this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky RBAC configuration question. I'll need to carefully review the exhibit and the options to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The Master database is for content authoring and staging, while the Web database is optimized for fast delivery of the live site. Selecting the right answer should be straightforward if I keep that in mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
11 months ago
Based on my understanding, the correct answer is D - actors, use cases, and associations. The use case diagram is focused on modeling the interactions between actors and the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
11 months ago
Okay, the question is asking about the next-hop for load-balanced traffic destined to 172.16.1.190. I think I can figure this out by analyzing the subnet and gateway information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
2 years ago
You know, I was also considering option B, but then I noticed that the question specifically mentions the 'read-write L3 operation'. So maybe option A, which includes that, could be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Deleting the existing rule 3 and creating a new one to allow the 'permit' command seems like the most straightforward solution. But let's hear what the others think.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
2 years ago
Good point. The 'read-write L3 operation' requirement is important. Option A might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Gayla
2 years ago
Yes, as long as the RBAC configuration is adjusted correctly, it should resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 years ago
I think the key is to ensure the proper permissions for LACP counters are set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 years ago
Changing the sequence of the rules might also fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
2 years ago
That could be a valid approach as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
2 years ago
But wouldn't deleting rule 3 and creating a new one to allow the permit command also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
2 years ago
I agree, allowing read-write L3 operation seems like the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
2 years ago
I think option A is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lamar
2 years ago
Hmm, that's an interesting idea. Rearranging the rules could potentially fix the problem. But let's not get too ahead of ourselves. We should probably double-check the options and make sure we're not missing something obvious.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel