Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 9 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam

Question #: 109
Topic #: 9

A network architect proposes a distinct Fibre Channel fabric to be used for a Cisco UCS blade server that hosts critical applications. Which action should be implemented for the fibre Channel traffic from the vHBA of this service to pass through the I/O module in the Cisco chassis to a specified uplink Fibre Channel port?

AInclude a SAN pin group in the vHBA policy.

BUpdate the applled Fibre Channel adapter policy.

CUpdate the applled global QoS policy.

DEnable persistent binding in the vHBA policy.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/ucs-manager/GUI-User-Guides/Storage-Mgmt/3-2/b_UCSM_GUI_Storage_Management_Guide_3_2/b_UCSM_GUI_Storage_Management_Guide_3_2_chapter_0110.pdf

by Sunshine at Apr 09, 2025, 03:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Toshia

3 months ago

Agreed with A, it's the standard approach for Fibre Channel traffic!

upvoted 0 times

...

Madonna

3 months ago

Wait, is D really necessary? I thought binding was optional.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

3 months ago

I think B makes more sense, gotta update the adapter policy first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

4 months ago

Definitely A, SAN pin groups are essential for that setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

4 months ago

C seems a bit off, QoS isn't really the priority here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlota

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards updating the applied global QoS policy, but I’m not confident if that directly affects the traffic flow through the I/O module.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizbeth

4 months ago

Enabling persistent binding in the vHBA policy sounds familiar, but I feel like there might be more to it than just that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Princess

5 months ago

I remember a practice question that mentioned updating the Fibre Channel adapter policy, but I can't recall the exact details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleshia

5 months ago

I think we might need to include a SAN pin group in the vHBA policy, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only step needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reena

5 months ago

Based on my understanding, the correct answer is to include a SAN pin group in the vHBA policy. This will ensure the Fibre Channel traffic is properly routed through the I/O module to the specified uplink port.

upvoted 0 times

...

Steffanie

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the specific requirements for Fibre Channel traffic in a Cisco UCS environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. I believe the key is to update the applied Fibre Channel adapter policy to ensure the Fibre Channel traffic from the vHBA can pass through the I/O module to the uplink port.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adaline

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to review the Fibre Channel and Cisco UCS concepts to figure out the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verda

6 months ago

This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is to include a SAN pin group in the vHBA policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassi

10 months ago

Persistent binding, all the way! Option D is the way to go. It's like putting the traffic on a one-way street, can't get any simpler than that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

10 months ago

I'm going with option A. It's the most direct way to channel that Fibre Channel traffic where it needs to go. No need to overcomplicate things.

upvoted 0 times

Allene

9 months ago

Agreed, A it is. Thanks for the input!

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

9 months ago

Let's go with A then, better to be safe than sorry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Silvana

10 months ago

I think option B might also work, but A is probably the safest choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mayra

10 months ago

I agree, option A seems like the most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

10 months ago

B is the obvious choice. Updating the Fibre Channel adapter policy is the way to go to get that traffic flowing through the uplink port.

upvoted 0 times

...

Orville

10 months ago

C is the answer, no doubt. Updating the global QoS policy will make sure the Fibre Channel traffic gets the right priority treatment.

upvoted 0 times

Annice

9 months ago

C) Update the applied global QoS policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylou

9 months ago

B) Update the applied Fibre Channel adapter policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marguerita

9 months ago

A) Include a SAN pin group in the vHBA policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbie

11 months ago

D seems like the way to go. Enabling persistent binding in the vHBA policy will guarantee that the traffic goes through the designated uplink port, no matter what.

upvoted 0 times

Bethanie

9 months ago

D) Enable persistent binding in the vHBA policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lacresha

10 months ago

B) Update the applied Fibre Channel adapter policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dante

10 months ago

A) Include a SAN pin group in the vHBA policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

11 months ago

I think option A is the correct answer. A SAN pin group in the vHBA policy will ensure that the Fibre Channel traffic is routed through the specified uplink port.

upvoted 0 times