Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit. FCoE is used in the topology between the SAN Storage devices and SAN-Core routers. After noticing traffic drops to hosts accessing SAN-B storage, the engineering team wants to reduce the oversubscription ratio in the topology. Which action must the team take?
D) Increase the bandwidth between the SAN-Coro and SAN-Edgo devices.
A) Increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage toward the SAN-Core devices.
B) Configure QoS to prioritize SAN-A traffic
C) Configure QoS to prioritize SAN-B traffic.

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 8 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 8
[All 300-610 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit. FCoE is used in the topology between the SAN Storage devices and SAN-Core routers. After noticing traffic drops to hosts accessing SAN-B storage, the engineering team wants to reduce the oversubscription ratio in the topology. Which action must the team take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Genevive at May 31, 2024, 06:36 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Beckie
9 months ago
Really? I didn’t expect bandwidth to be the solution here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
9 months ago
QoS for SAN-A? Not sure that helps the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
10 months ago
Wait, why not just boost the SAN-Core to Edge bandwidth?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
10 months ago
I think prioritizing SAN-B traffic is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
10 months ago
Increasing bandwidth to SAN-B makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
10 months ago
I vaguely remember that QoS can be configured for different SANs, but I can't decide if prioritizing SAN-A or SAN-B would be more effective in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
11 months ago
I feel like increasing bandwidth is a common solution, but I can't recall if it should be between the SAN-Core and SAN-Edge devices instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
11 months ago
I think we practiced a question where QoS was important for traffic management. Maybe prioritizing SAN-B traffic could help with the drops?
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
11 months ago
I remember studying about oversubscription ratios and how increasing bandwidth can help, but I'm not sure if it should be between SAN-A and SAN-B or somewhere else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. Increasing the bandwidth between the storage and core seems like it could work, but configuring QoS to prioritize one storage system over another also seems plausible. I'll have to think this through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The issue is with traffic drops to hosts accessing SAN-B storage, so we need to prioritize that traffic. That means the answer is to configure QoS to prioritize SAN-B traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Is the question asking about the bandwidth between the storage and the core, or the bandwidth between the core and the edge? I need to re-read this carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
11 months ago
This seems straightforward - the question is asking how to reduce oversubscription, so I think increasing the bandwidth between the SAN-A and SAN-B storage and the SAN-Core devices is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
11 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident I know the two forms of Check Point licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know VRRP advertisements include some kind of timer information, but I can't remember if they're sent from just the master or both the master and standby routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
11 months ago
I remember some practice questions mentioning LDAP for security flows, but I'm not sure it's the primary one for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
I bet the engineering team is scratching their heads, trying to figure out where all those socks are disappearing to in the SAN. Maybe they need to hire a better sock-tracking system.
upvoted 0 times
Leoma
1 year ago
Maybe that will improve the oversubscription ratio in the topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
1 year ago
D) Increase the bandwidth between the SAN-Core and SAN-Edge devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
1 year ago
That could help with the traffic drops to SAN-B storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
A) Increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage toward the SAN-Core devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickole
1 year ago
Wait, what's a 'SAN-Coro'? Is that some sort of new dance move? Just kidding, I think the answer is clear - more bandwidth between the storage devices is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
1 year ago
User 3: Agreed, more bandwidth should help with the traffic drops to hosts accessing SAN-B storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like the best solution to reduce oversubscription.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
1 year ago
User 1: I think we need to increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Increasing the bandwidth between the SAN-Core and SAN-Edge devices seems like it might do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Salina
1 year ago
D) Increase the bandwidth between the SAN-Core and SAN-Edge devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
1 year ago
A) Increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage toward the SAN-Core devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
1 year ago
Nah, man. Prioritizing the traffic is not the solution here. We need to upgrade the capacity to handle the load.
upvoted 0 times
Paulina
1 year ago
Nah, man. Prioritizing the traffic is not the solution here. We need to upgrade the capacity to handle the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
1 year ago
D) Increase the bandwidth between the SAN-Core and SAN-Edge devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
1 year ago
A) Increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage toward the SAN-Core devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
Aha! Increasing the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage is the way to go. That's the key bottleneck in this setup.
upvoted 0 times
Delisa
1 year ago
Rolf: No, increasing the bandwidth is the priority in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 year ago
User 3: Should we also configure QoS to prioritize SAN-A traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, that should help reduce the oversubscription ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
1 year ago
User 1: We need to increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wynell
1 year ago
But wouldn't configuring QoS to prioritize SAN-B traffic also help?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
1 year ago
I agree with Joanna. That would help reduce the oversubscription ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
1 year ago
I think we should increase the bandwidth between SAN-A and SAN-B Storage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel