Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 8 Question 87 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit A company plans to implement high availability between the iSCSI host and the Fibre Channel target. Which solution must the company implement to recover from a failure of a host NIC. MDS IP storage port or Fibre Channel target port?
C) Map the Fibre Channel target ports to one IP storage port
A) Implement HSRPofi thf MDS IP storage ports
B) Set up IP storage ports to export the two Fibre Channel target ports
D) Configure FCoE between the host NICs and MDS ports

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 8 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 8
[All 300-610 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit A company plans to implement high availability between the iSCSI host and the Fibre Channel target. Which solution must the company implement to recover from a failure of a host NIC. MDS IP storage port or Fibre Channel target port?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Huey
9 months ago
C is a no-go, mapping to one port isn't high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
9 months ago
B could work too, but A feels more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
10 months ago
Wait, can we really rely on HSRP for this? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
10 months ago
Definitely agree with A, it makes sense for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
10 months ago
I think option A is the right choice for HSRP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
10 months ago
FCoE was mentioned in our last session, but I’m not confident if it directly relates to high availability in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
11 months ago
I remember something about mapping Fibre Channel ports to IP storage ports, but I can't recall if that's the best way to handle NIC failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
11 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice exam where we had to set up redundancy for storage connections. I feel like option B could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
11 months ago
I think we discussed HSRP in class, but I'm not entirely sure how it applies to MDS IP storage ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, setting up IP storage ports to export the two Fibre Channel target ports. That way, if one of the Fibre Channel target ports fails, the other one can take over and maintain the high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The question is asking about recovering from a failure of a specific component, so the solution needs to provide redundancy for that component. Based on the options, it seems like implementing HSRP on the MDS IP storage ports would be the way to go to handle a failure of the host NIC or Fibre Channel target port.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different options here. I'm not sure if I fully understand the differences between HSRP, IP storage ports, and FCoE. I'll need to review those concepts before I can confidently choose the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
11 months ago
This question is asking about how to recover from a failure in the high availability setup between the iSCSI host and Fibre Channel target. I think the key is to identify the component that needs to be redundant to handle a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
11 months ago
HttpSession and a database, for sure. Gotta keep that cart data tied to the user, but also need a way to store it long-term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about MPLS applications. I'll need to think this through carefully and try to remember what I learned about MPLS in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
11 months ago
I think I know this one - it's option B, right? One Stream Manager can be associated with multiple SIP Servers, but only under the same Tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward GDPR compliance question. I'll need to carefully review the information required to be provided to data subjects.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel