Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 7 Question 110 Discussion

A network administrator must create a redundant vHBA for the mission-critical virtual machines (VMs) installed on a Cisco UCS Fabric Interconnect blade server. The VMs access multiple datastores using VSAN55 and VSAN95. The datastore on which the VMs are hosted must be accessible if any of the uplinks goes offline. Which action meets these requirements?
B) Assign VSAN55 and VSAN95 to vHBA1 and vHBA2.
A) Attach VSAN55 to vHBA1 and VSAN95 to vHBA2.
C) Enable failover for the vHBA with VSAN55 and VSAN95 enabled.
D) Configure load-balancing for vHBAs with VSAN55 and VSAN95 attached.

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 7 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 7
[All 300-610 Questions]

A network administrator must create a redundant vHBA for the mission-critical virtual machines (VMs) installed on a Cisco UCS Fabric Interconnect blade server. The VMs access multiple datastores using VSAN55 and VSAN95. The datastore on which the VMs are hosted must be accessible if any of the uplinks goes offline. Which action meets these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Georgene at Apr 30, 2025, 03:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Aracelis
9 months ago
Wait, can you really attach both VSANs to one vHBA? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
9 months ago
D seems off, load-balancing isn't the priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
9 months ago
C sounds right, failover is key here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
9 months ago
I think B might actually work too, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
9 months ago
A is the way to go for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
10 months ago
Load balancing sounds good in theory, but I’m not sure if it actually provides the redundancy needed for the VMs in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
10 months ago
I think assigning both VSANs to the same vHBA could work, but I’m not completely confident if that meets the redundancy requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
10 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to ensure failover capabilities. I think enabling failover might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
10 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of redundancy in vHBAs, but I'm not sure if attaching VSANs to separate vHBAs is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
11 months ago
The key here is to have the VMs access the datastores through separate vHBAs. I'm going to go with option A, as it seems to best meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
11 months ago
I think option C might be the way to go. Enabling failover for the vHBA with both VSAN55 and VSAN95 enabled should ensure redundancy and maintain access to the datastore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. We need to create a redundant vHBA for the mission-critical VMs, and the datastore must be accessible even if an uplink goes offline. I'm leaning towards option B, but I'll double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe I should have paid more attention in class instead of doodling cute kittens in my notebook.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
1 year ago
D is the way to go! Load-balancing the vHBAs with the two VSANs is the best way to ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
1 year ago
User 4: I think option D is the best solution for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Tammara, option A seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 year ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
1 year ago
User 1: I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
I think enabling failover for the vHBA with both VSANs is the best option for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
1 year ago
I'd go with C. Enabling failover for the vHBA with both VSANs should keep the datastore accessible even if an uplink goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 year ago
But wouldn't assigning both VSANs to separate vHBAs provide redundancy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
1 year ago
Option B looks good to me. Assigning both VSANs to both vHBAs seems like the way to go for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Tori
1 year ago
User 3: That makes sense, it's important to have redundancy for mission-critical VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, having both VSAN55 and VSAN95 on both vHBAs ensures access to the datastore even if an uplink goes offline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 year ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice. Assigning both VSANs to both vHBAs provides redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hermila
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel