Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 1 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 1
[All 300-610 Questions]

An engineer is building a data center network with VXLAN EVPN. The requirement is to use multicast for the broadcast, unknown unicast, and multicast replication.

Which two VNI to multicast group mapping methods must be used to meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Queenie
4 months ago
I agree with A, but I'm not sold on C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
4 months ago
A and E seem right to me. Multicast is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
4 months ago
Wait, can you really use many VNI to one multicast group? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
5 months ago
I think B and D could work too, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
5 months ago
Definitely A and C for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
5 months ago
I definitely remember that "many VNI to many multicast groups" is a possibility, but I’m not sure if it fits this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the options. I feel like "many NVE to one multicast group" might be relevant, but I can't recall the exact context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think "one VNI to one multicast group" could be a valid choice for specific broadcasts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
6 months ago
I think we might need to use "many VNI to one multicast group" for the unknown unicast traffic, but I'm not entirely sure about the second option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
6 months ago
The question is straightforward, but I want to double-check my understanding before submitting my answer. I think Argelia's strategy of breaking it down methodically is a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between "many VNI to one multicast group" and "one VNI to one multicast group." I'll need to review those options more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards "many NVE to one multicast group" and "one VNI to one multicast group" as the two best options to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The key is to use the mapping methods that support multicast for broadcast, unknown unicast, and multicast replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is asking about the principal market, which is the market with the greatest volume and activity for the asset or liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
10 months ago
I'm feeling a bit like a unicorn here, but I think the right answer is B and D. One VNI to one multicast group, and one NVE to many multicast groups. It just makes sense, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Camellia
9 months ago
Definitely. It's all about ensuring efficient broadcast, unknown unicast, and multicast replication in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
9 months ago
That's a good point. It's important to have the right mapping methods to meet the requirements of the data center network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
9 months ago
I agree with you. And having one NVE to many multicast groups would definitely help with the replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
9 months ago
I think you're onto something there. One VNI to one multicast group does seem like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dante
10 months ago
B and C all the way! One VNI to one multicast group, and many VNI to one multicast group. Simple and straightforward, just the way I like it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
10 months ago
I'm going with B and E. Using one VNI to one multicast group and many VNI to many multicast groups seems like the most flexible and scalable approach.
upvoted 0 times
Jess
9 months ago
It's important to consider both isolation and scalability when designing the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
9 months ago
I think many VNI to many multicast groups provides better scalability and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
10 months ago
I agree, using one VNI to one multicast group ensures isolation and simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe A and C could work, but I'm a bit confused about the 'many NVE to one multicast group' part. Seems like that could get messy.
upvoted 0 times
Elke
9 months ago
User 3: Yeah, using multiple VNIs with one multicast group could simplify the network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, having one VNI to one multicast group and many VNI to one multicast group would cover all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
10 months ago
User 1: I think B and C would be the best options for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bronwyn
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) many VNI to one multicast group could also work. What do you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is B and C. One VNI to one multicast group and many VNI to one multicast group should meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Alesia
10 months ago
So, the best options would be B and C for the VNI to multicast group mapping methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
10 months ago
That's a good point, having many NVE to one multicast group can definitely help with scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
10 months ago
I think we should also consider many NVE to one multicast group for better scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
10 months ago
I agree, using one VNI to one multicast group and many VNI to one multicast group should cover all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
11 months ago
Yes, that combination should ensure that broadcast, unknown unicast, and multicast traffic is properly replicated across the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
11 months ago
I agree, using one VNI to one multicast group and many VNI to one multicast group should cover all the replication requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lea
12 months ago
I agree with Christiane. Using one VNI to one multicast group makes sense for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
12 months ago
I think the answer is B) one VNI to one multicast group.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel