Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-440 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.A company uses Cisco SD-WAN in the data center. All devices have the default configuration. An engineer attempts to add a new centralized control policy in Cisco vManage but receives an error message. What is the problem?
D) Site-list 'All-Site' should be configured with a new match sequence that is lower than the sequence for site-list 'Hub*.
A) A centralized control policy is already applied to the specific site ID and direction
B) The policy for 'Hub' should be applied in the outbound direction, and the policy for 'All-Site' should be applied inbound.
C) Apply an additional outbound control policy to override the site ID overlaps.

Cisco 300-440 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-440 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All 300-440 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A company uses Cisco SD-WAN in the data center. All devices have the default configuration. An engineer attempts to add a new centralized control policy in Cisco vManage but receives an error message. What is the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The problem is that the site-list ''All-Site'' has a higher match sequence than the site-list ''Hub'', which means that the policy for ''All-Site'' will take precedence over the policy for ''Hub'' for any site that belongs to both lists. This creates a conflict and prevents the engineer from adding a new centralized control policy in Cisco vManage. To resolve this issue, the site-list ''All-Site'' should be configured with a new match sequence that is lower than the sequence for site-list ''Hub'', so that the policy for ''Hub'' will be applied first and then the policy for ''All-Site'' will be applied only to the remaining sites that are not in the ''Hub'' list.Reference:=

Designing and Implementing Cloud Connectivity (ENCC, Track 1 of 5), Module 3: Cisco SD-WAN Cloud OnRamp for Colocation, Lesson 3: Cisco SD-WAN Cloud OnRamp for Colocation - Centralized Control Policies

Cisco SD-WAN Cloud OnRamp for Colocation Deployment Guide, Chapter 4: Configuring Centralized Control Policies

Cisco SD-WAN Configuration Guide, Release 20.3, Chapter: Centralized Policy Framework, Section: Policy Configuration Overview


by Johnetta at Mar 10, 2024, 04:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-440 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Frankie
9 months ago
I disagree, I think option D could be the key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
9 months ago
Definitely need to check the site ID configurations first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
10 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
10 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of overlapping policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
10 months ago
I vaguely recall that sequence numbers play a role in policy application. Option D might be the answer if that's the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where overlapping site IDs caused issues. Option C sounds familiar, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the direction of the policies matters. Could it be option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
11 months ago
I remember something about centralized policies being exclusive to site IDs, so maybe option A is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
11 months ago
Based on the information provided, I believe the answer is option A. A centralized control policy is likely already applied to the specific site ID and direction, causing the conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the error message. I'll need to review the Cisco SD-WAN documentation to make sure I understand the correct way to configure these policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key is understanding how the centralized control policy is applied and the potential conflicts between the site IDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the Cisco SD-WAN configuration details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
11 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident the answer is C - Debugger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky BGP policy question. I'll need to carefully read through the policy statement and understand how the prefix lists are being used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. Continuous data can be measured on a continuum and has meaningful decimal subdivisions, so that matches the description in the question. I'm feeling good about selecting A as the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
11 months ago
Okay, I've got it now. A and C are the correct answers since they both use the `new java.util.Date()` to get the current date and output it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
2 years ago
I think the site-list 'All-Site' should be configured with a new match sequence that is lower than the sequence for site-list 'Hub'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
2 years ago
Maybe applying an additional outbound control policy to override the site ID overlaps could solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
2 years ago
I believe the policy for 'Hub' should be applied in the outbound direction, and the policy for 'All-Site' should be applied inbound.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
2 years ago
I think the problem is that a centralized control policy is already applied to the specific site ID and direction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
2 years ago
I believe we need to configure a new match sequence for the 'All-Site' site-list to resolve the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 years ago
Maybe the problem lies in the sequence of the match for the site-lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
2 years ago
Yes, I agree. The error message might be due to applying the policies in the wrong direction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
2 years ago
I think the issue might be related to the direction of the policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
2 years ago
Haha, I'm glad I'm not the only one scratching my head on this one. These Cisco SD-WAN questions can be real head-scratchers sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
2 years ago
I agree, the default configuration is probably the key here. I'm not sure if option B is the right answer, as it seems to be suggesting a different direction for the policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
2 years ago
Okay, let's take a closer look at the exhibit. It seems like there's an issue with the centralized control policy application. I'm leaning towards option D, but I want to hear what the others think.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
2 years ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. The default configuration makes me wonder if there's something specific I'm missing here.
upvoted 0 times
Doug
2 years ago
Sounds like a plan. Let's go ahead and make those changes in vManage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
2 years ago
Great idea! Let's give that a try and see if it resolves the error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
2 years ago
I think the best option is to configure the site-list "All-Site" with a new match sequence that is lower than the sequence for site-list "Hub".
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
2 years ago
That could work, or we could configure the site-list "All-Site" with a lower match sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
2 years ago
Should we try applying an additional outbound control policy to override the site ID overlaps?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
2 years ago
You're right. It looks like the policy for "Hub" needs to be applied outbound.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
2 years ago
I think the issue might be related to the default configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel