Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-425 Exam - Topic 4 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 4
[All 300-425 Questions]

A company has 10 access point licenses available on their backup Cisco WLC and their primary Cisco WLC is at full capacity, 5 access points are set to high failover priority and 7 access points are set to critical failover priority. During a failure, not all critical access points failed over to the backup Cisco WLC. Which configuration

is the cause of this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2016/pdf/BRKCOL-2275.pdf


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Fausto
3 months ago
I think it's option A, high priority APs taking up too much space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
3 months ago
I agree, definitely oversubscribed on critical priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
4 months ago
Nah, I’m leaning towards D. Disabling that setting could mess things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
4 months ago
Wait, how can they have more critical than available licenses?
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
4 months ago
Sounds like option C is the culprit. Too many critical APs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m not entirely confident. The critical access points might not have enough licenses to failover properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
I feel like the network ap-priority setting could play a role, but I can't recall if it should be enabled or disabled for proper failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
5 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where the critical access points were not all failing over. Could it be that their count is oversubscribed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
5 months ago
I remember something about priority settings, but I'm not sure if the high priority access points being oversubscribed is the main issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
5 months ago
Ah, I see. The high priority access points are oversubscribed, so not all of them could failover to the backup WLC. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The issue is likely that the critical priority access point count is oversubscribed, meaning there are more critical access points than the backup WLC can handle. I'll select option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to re-read the question a few times to make sure I understand all the key details before attempting to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully review the details about the access point licenses and failover priorities to determine the likely cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
11 months ago
Hey, I've got a joke for you: What do you call a Cisco engineer who can't manage their access point priorities? A priority-tary! *laughs* But in all seriousness, I think Malissa hit the nail on the head. The critical priority access point count is the culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
Pok
10 months ago
Looks like some reconfiguration is needed to prevent this issue from happening again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
10 months ago
That's right, the configuration needs to be adjusted to ensure all critical access points can fail over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
10 months ago
I agree, the critical priority access point count is oversubscribed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonne
11 months ago
Haha, looks like someone needs to upgrade their Cisco WLC licenses! But seriously, I agree with Malissa. The critical priority access point count is oversubscribed, so not all of them can fail over to the backup WLC.
upvoted 0 times
Ivory
10 months ago
D: Agreed, it's causing issues during failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
10 months ago
C: They should definitely upgrade their licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
11 months ago
B: Yeah, that's probably why not all of them failed over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
11 months ago
A: The critical priority access point count is oversubscribed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malissa
11 months ago
I think the issue is that the critical priority access point count is oversubscribed. The question states that there are 7 critical access points, but the backup WLC only has 10 licenses available, so it can't accommodate all the critical access points.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
11 months ago
It's possible, but I believe the critical priority access points are more important for failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
11 months ago
But what about the high priority access point being oversubscribed? Could that be the cause?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
11 months ago
I think the cause of the issue is that the critical priority access point count is oversubscribed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel