Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 15 Question 83 Discussion

Which feature provides the capability for intra-VN traffic filtering and control within the Cisco SO-Access architecture?
A) scalable groups
B) MAC ACL
C) prefix list
D) service policy

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 15 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 15
[All 300-420 Questions]

Which feature provides the capability for intra-VN traffic filtering and control within the Cisco SO-Access architecture?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Kasandra at Mar 10, 2024, 11:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carman
9 months ago
I had no idea scalable groups did that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
9 months ago
Prefix lists are great, but not for this purpose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
10 months ago
Wait, are you sure it's not MAC ACL?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
10 months ago
Totally agree, scalable groups make it so much easier!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
10 months ago
Scalable groups are the way to go for intra-VN traffic control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
10 months ago
Service policies could be involved, but I feel like they’re more about QoS rather than direct traffic filtering. I might go with scalable groups too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
11 months ago
Prefix lists seem more related to routing than traffic control within a VN, so I’m leaning towards scalable groups as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
11 months ago
I remember practicing with MAC ACLs, but I don't think they specifically handle intra-VN traffic filtering like scalable groups do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
11 months ago
I think scalable groups might be the right answer since they deal with traffic filtering in VN environments, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to need to draw on my knowledge of Cisco networking features and try to match them up with the capabilities described in the question. I think I have a strategy, but I'll need to double-check my work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The terminology around the Cisco SO-Access architecture isn't something I'm super familiar with. I'll need to take a closer look at the options and try to reason through which one makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on my understanding of the Cisco SO-Access architecture, the feature that provides intra-VN traffic filtering and control is the "scalable groups". I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options don't seem super familiar to me, so I'll need to think it through carefully. Maybe I can eliminate a couple of the options that don't seem as relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
11 months ago
This question seems to be asking about a specific feature within the Cisco SO-Access architecture. I'll need to carefully review the options and think about which one best matches the capability for intra-VN traffic filtering and control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I remember the system catalog is accessible as a table, but the binary format part in C seems off. And E doesn't sound right either. I think I've got a good handle on this, I'll mark B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
11 months ago
This looks straightforward. I think Protect Current Sheet is the best option to prevent other employees from changing, moving, or deleting the important data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards accounts receivable as well. It allows the firm to access funds without going through a formal financing process, which fits the "spontaneous" criteria in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
11 months ago
The zone of tolerance is all about the range of service performance that customers find acceptable, right? If that's the case, then I think the complexity of the product or service (option D) could also be a key factor. The more complex the offering, the wider the zone of tolerance might need to be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
11 months ago
I think I remember that the 100G line cards can be used as muxponder trunks, but I'm not sure about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
2 years ago
I see your point, but I believe MAC ACL is more specific for intra-VN traffic filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
2 years ago
But isn't service policy also used for traffic control? I think D) service policy could be the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
2 years ago
I agree with you, MAC ACL makes sense for traffic filtering within the architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) MAC ACL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
2 years ago
Scalable groups could also work, depending on the setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
2 years ago
Service policy might be an option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
2 years ago
I think prefix list could also provide that capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
2 years ago
I agree, MAC ACL allows for control within the architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 years ago
I believe it's MAC ACL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
2 years ago
What do you think is the feature for intra-VN traffic filtering?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
2 years ago
Okay, let's break this down. Intra-VN traffic filtering and control... That sounds like something related to access control or policies within a virtual network. I'm gonna go with 'service policy' on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 years ago
Hmm, I wonder if they're trying to trick us with this question. Maybe it's a feature we haven't heard of before. *scratches head* This is gonna be a tough one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. The options given don't seem like obvious choices. I'm leaning towards either 'scalable groups' or 'service policy', but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
2 years ago
This question seems a bit tricky. I'm not sure if the Cisco SO-Access architecture has a specific feature for intra-VN traffic filtering and control.
upvoted 0 times
Deonna
2 years ago
C) prefix list
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
2 years ago
A) scalable groups
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
2 years ago
D) service policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
2 years ago
B) MAC ACL
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel