Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 15 Question 74 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is designing an OSPF solution for a customer. The design must take into consideration:Application load balancers D. E. and F are in different geographical locations and are OSPF-enabled.Hosts A, B. and C connect to an application through the load balancers using IP address 10.1.1.1/32.In the event of a failure of one of the load balancers, hosts must still have access to the application.Which solution must the engineer choose?
C) At least one load balancer to be in area 0.
A) All load balancers to be co-located in area 0.
B) X, Y, and Z to be configured as different areas
D) X, Y and Z to be configured as the same area

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 15 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 15
[All 300-420 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is designing an OSPF solution for a customer. The design must take into consideration:

Application load balancers D. E. and F are in different geographical locations and are OSPF-enabled.

Hosts A, B. and C connect to an application through the load balancers using IP address 10.1.1.1/32.

In the event of a failure of one of the load balancers, hosts must still have access to the application.

Which solution must the engineer choose?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lucina at Aug 04, 2023, 10:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ronald
9 months ago
Surprised that people are considering different areas at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
10 months ago
Definitely not option B, that would complicate things too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
10 months ago
Wait, why would you want all load balancers in area 0? Seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
10 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
10 months ago
Load balancers need to be in the same area for OSPF to work efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m a bit confused about how the geographical locations affect OSPF area design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
11 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced about OSPF area configurations. I wonder if keeping all load balancers in the same area would really ensure access during a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
11 months ago
I think having at least one load balancer in area 0 might help with failover, but I can't recall the exact benefits of that setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
11 months ago
I remember studying OSPF areas, but I'm not sure if co-locating all load balancers in area 0 is the best option for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by all the abbreviations and technical terms here. I'll need to make sure I understand what each of these performance events means before I can make a confident choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. The options seem similar, so I'll need to really read through them closely to understand the nuances and pick the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The control environment sets the tone for the organization, so I need to identify which of these factors is not part of that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
11 months ago
Okay, I know the /etc/skel directory is used for new user accounts, but I'm not sure about the specifics. I'll have to review my notes on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy. I'll first identify the main purposes of supplier management, then eliminate the options that clearly align with those purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 year ago
Wait, are we sure the load balancers are not actually just really big hamsters running on wheels? That would explain a lot about the design choices.
upvoted 0 times
Latosha
1 year ago
Yeah, option C seems like the best choice to maintain access to the application even if one of the load balancers fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
1 year ago
I think the engineer should choose option C, at least one load balancer to be in area 0 to ensure access to the application in case of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
That would be a funny sight to see, but I don't think load balancers are actually hamsters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elroy
1 year ago
Option A sounds good, but I'm not sure if it's the best solution. Having all the load balancers co-located in area 0 could create a single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option D. Configuring all the load balancers in the same area might simplify the design and make it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
Lenora
1 year ago
Sheridan: Exactly, it's important to consider ease of management when designing network solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, it would definitely simplify the design and management of the OSPF solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, having them in the same area seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, it would definitely simplify the design and management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D makes sense. Having all load balancers in the same area could be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D makes sense. Having all load balancers in the same area could make things easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuette
1 year ago
Option B seems like a better choice. Separating the load balancers into different areas will provide better redundancy and resilience in case of a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
1 year ago
I think option C is the way to go. Having at least one load balancer in area 0 ensures that hosts can still access the application even if one of the load balancers fails.
upvoted 0 times
Lezlie
1 year ago
True, but having one in area 0 ensures that hosts can still reach the application in case of a failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
1 year ago
That's a good point, having all load balancers in the same area could simplify the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to have all load balancers in the same area for consistency?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
1 year ago
I agree, having at least one load balancer in area 0 is crucial for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herman
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to have all load balancers co-located in area 0 for better control?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
1 year ago
I agree, having at least one load balancer in area 0 ensures redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
1 year ago
I think the engineer should choose option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel