Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 14 Question 107 Discussion

Posted by Linwood on Feb 05, 2025 at 11:44 PM

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A customer is planning to onboard three new VPN partner connections in the data center. The new subnets must not overlap with the existing data center network, and the subnet size must not be bigger than necessary. The customer dedicated 10.1.8.0/21 for this design. Ho1// must the subnets be divided to meet these requirements?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
DA
Daren 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure those subnets won't overlap?
AN
Antonio 11 months ago
Totally agree with you, Mona!
MA
Marcelle 11 months ago
Not sure if that's the right subnetting approach...
JO
Joye 11 months ago
I think Option B is the best choice here!
MO
Mona 12 months ago
The subnet 10.1.8.0/21 gives us 2048 IPs.
TI
Tijuana 12 months ago
I think the key is ensuring no overlap, but I can't recall if we should go with the largest or smallest subnet option.
JO
Jose 1 year ago
I feel like I might be overthinking the size of the subnets. Should we aim for /24 for each connection?
JO
Joanne 1 year ago
This question seems similar to the practice ones we did on subnetting. I think we need to divide the 10.1.8.0/21 into smaller subnets for the VPNs.
AN
Antonette 1 year ago
I remember we discussed subnetting in class, but I'm not entirely sure how to apply it here with the /21 prefix.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
I'm confident I can solve this. The requirements are clear, and the subnet options provide enough information to determine the correct answer. I'll double-check my work, but I think Option C is the way to go.
JO
Josefa 1 year ago
This is a good test of my subnet planning skills. I'll need to consider the size of each subnet option and how it aligns with the stated requirements. I'm going to work through this step-by-step.
VI
Vinnie 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to find the smallest subnet that can accommodate the three new VPN connections without overlapping the existing network. I'm leaning towards Option B.
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different subnet options presented. I'll need to do some quick calculations to figure out which one best meets the requirements.
PE
Peggie 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky subnet design question. I'll need to carefully analyze the requirements and the subnet options to determine the best solution.
LA
Lai 1 year ago
Just when I thought this exam couldn't get any more exciting, they throw in a subnet design question. Option D for the win!
NO
Novella 1 year ago
Haha, Option A looks like it was drawn by a toddler. I'll go with Option D, the one that actually makes sense.
JO
Joesph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
Option D is the clear winner here.
VA
Vallie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
Definitely, Option D is the most practical one.
EL
Elza 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
Yeah, Option D seems like the most logical choice.
RO
Rolland 1 year ago
↳ replying to Novella
I agree, Option A does look a bit messy.
FA
Farrah 1 year ago
Option C is tempting, but I think Option D is the way to go. It's the most efficient use of the available address space.
VE
Venita 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. The subnet sizes seem more appropriate for the given requirement.
OL
Olive 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
Yes, Option B provides the best subnet division for the new VPN partner connections.
VI
Vi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
I agree, Option B seems to be the most suitable for the customer's needs.
JI
Jin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
I think Option B is the best choice too. The subnet sizes look just right.
IN
In 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
Option B does seem like the most appropriate choice for this scenario.
LE
Levi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
I agree, Option B seems to be the most suitable for the customer's requirements.
CA
Cammy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Venita
I think Option B is the best choice too. The subnet sizes look good.
JA
Jacquelyne 2 years ago
Option D looks like the correct choice here. The subnets are divided efficiently without overlapping with the existing network.
RE
Reita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacquelyne
Option D is the optimal solution for onboarding the new VPN partner connections.
SH
Sharika 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacquelyne
The subnet size must not be bigger than necessary, so Option D is the most efficient.
TO
Tonette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacquelyne
Yes, Option D ensures that the new subnets do not overlap with the existing network.
CR
Cristina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jacquelyne
I agree, Option D seems to be the best choice for dividing the subnets.
SO
Socorro 2 years ago
I believe Option C might be the best choice for dividing the subnets effectively.
AL
Alonso 2 years ago
I agree with Lawrence. It's important to ensure the new subnets don't overlap with the existing network.
LA
Lawrence 2 years ago
I think the subnets should be divided into smaller sizes to avoid overlap.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel