Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 14 Question 107 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam

Question #: 107
Topic #: 14

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A customer is planning to onboard three new VPN partner connections in the data center. The new subnets must not overlap with the existing data center network, and the subnet size must not be bigger than necessary. The customer dedicated 10.1.8.0/21 for this design. Ho1// must the subnets be divided to meet these requirements?

AOption A

BOption B

COption C

DOption D

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Linwood at Feb 05, 2025, 11:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Daren

9 months ago

Wait, are we sure those subnets won't overlap?

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

9 months ago

Totally agree with you, Mona!

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcelle

10 months ago

Not sure if that's the right subnetting approach...

upvoted 0 times

...

Joye

10 months ago

I think Option B is the best choice here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

10 months ago

The subnet 10.1.8.0/21 gives us 2048 IPs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tijuana

10 months ago

I think the key is ensuring no overlap, but I can't recall if we should go with the largest or smallest subnet option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

11 months ago

I feel like I might be overthinking the size of the subnets. Should we aim for /24 for each connection?

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanne

11 months ago

This question seems similar to the practice ones we did on subnetting. I think we need to divide the 10.1.8.0/21 into smaller subnets for the VPNs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonette

11 months ago

I remember we discussed subnetting in class, but I'm not entirely sure how to apply it here with the /21 prefix.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

11 months ago

I'm confident I can solve this. The requirements are clear, and the subnet options provide enough information to determine the correct answer. I'll double-check my work, but I think Option C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josefa

11 months ago

This is a good test of my subnet planning skills. I'll need to consider the size of each subnet option and how it aligns with the stated requirements. I'm going to work through this step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vinnie

11 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to find the smallest subnet that can accommodate the three new VPN connections without overlapping the existing network. I'm leaning towards Option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different subnet options presented. I'll need to do some quick calculations to figure out which one best meets the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggie

11 months ago

This looks like a tricky subnet design question. I'll need to carefully analyze the requirements and the subnet options to determine the best solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

1 year ago

Just when I thought this exam couldn't get any more exciting, they throw in a subnet design question. Option D for the win!

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

1 year ago

Haha, Option A looks like it was drawn by a toddler. I'll go with Option D, the one that actually makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

Joesph

1 year ago

Option D is the clear winner here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

1 year ago

Definitely, Option D is the most practical one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elza

1 year ago

Yeah, Option D seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolland

1 year ago

I agree, Option A does look a bit messy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Farrah

1 year ago

Option C is tempting, but I think Option D is the way to go. It's the most efficient use of the available address space.

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards Option B. The subnet sizes seem more appropriate for the given requirement.

upvoted 0 times

Olive

1 year ago

Yes, Option B provides the best subnet division for the new VPN partner connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vi

1 year ago

I agree, Option B seems to be the most suitable for the customer's needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jin

1 year ago

I think Option B is the best choice too. The subnet sizes look just right.

upvoted 0 times

...

In

1 year ago

Option B does seem like the most appropriate choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

1 year ago

I agree, Option B seems to be the most suitable for the customer's requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

1 year ago

I think Option B is the best choice too. The subnet sizes look good.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

1 year ago

Option D looks like the correct choice here. The subnets are divided efficiently without overlapping with the existing network.

upvoted 0 times

Reita

1 year ago

Option D is the optimal solution for onboarding the new VPN partner connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

1 year ago

The subnet size must not be bigger than necessary, so Option D is the most efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonette

1 year ago

Yes, Option D ensures that the new subnets do not overlap with the existing network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristina

1 year ago

I agree, Option D seems to be the best choice for dividing the subnets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Socorro

1 year ago

I believe Option C might be the best choice for dividing the subnets effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonso

1 year ago

I agree with Lawrence. It's important to ensure the new subnets don't overlap with the existing network.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawrence

1 year ago

I think the subnets should be divided into smaller sizes to avoid overlap.

upvoted 0 times

...