Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 1 Question 89 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. An architect must ensure a convergence time of 200 ms or less during a link failure within area 0. In addition, the solution must not impact the overall performance of the network. Which solution must the architect select?
B) BFD
A) UDLD
C) fast hellos
D) carrier delay

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 1 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 1
[All 300-420 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An architect must ensure a convergence time of 200 ms or less during a link failure within area 0. In addition, the solution must not impact the overall performance of the network. Which solution must the architect select?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gertude at May 17, 2024, 05:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Chana
9 months ago
Totally agree, BFD is the way to go for this scenario!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
9 months ago
Wait, is 200 ms really the standard? That seems too slow!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
10 months ago
UDLD is more about link integrity, not really for convergence time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
10 months ago
I think fast hellos could work too, but not as reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
10 months ago
BFD is the best choice for fast convergence!
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
10 months ago
Carrier delay sounds familiar, but I don't think it’s the right solution for ensuring quick convergence. I feel like it might actually slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where UDLD was mentioned, but I don't think it directly addresses convergence time like BFD does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think fast hellos might be a viable choice too. I just can't recall if it meets the performance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
11 months ago
I remember studying about BFD and how it helps with fast failure detection. It seems like a good option for keeping the convergence time under 200 ms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
11 months ago
This is a great question that really tests our understanding of different convergence mechanisms. I'm confident that BFD is the best choice here to meet the strict convergence requirement without affecting the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. Can someone explain the differences between UDLD, BFD, and fast hellos? I want to make sure I understand the tradeoffs before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is finding the solution that meets the 200ms convergence time without impacting overall network performance. I'm leaning towards BFD based on what I know about its fast failure detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with some of these options like UDLD and BFD. I'll need to review the details of each to determine the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around convergence time and overall network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure on this one. Is it the project manager who would need the technical interface requirements, or the implementation subject matter experts? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
11 months ago
Good point. I think the key is to identify the options that show the organization is truly customer-oriented, not just optimizing internal processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused between options B and C. I know one allows traffic between interfaces, but I think intra might be what's needed here since they are in the same zone?
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
11 months ago
I really don't recall encountering a question saying we can't create new datatypes in Solidity. That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
1 year ago
Ah, the old 'which protocol can make my network run like a caffeine-fueled cheetah' question. BFD all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Alex
1 year ago
User 4: Agreed, BFD will ensure the network stays speedy during failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, BFD is the way to go for quick link failure detection
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
1 year ago
User 2: I think BFD is the best choice for fast convergence
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
1 year ago
User 3: BFD is the way to go
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely BFD
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
1 year ago
User 1: BFD
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
1 year ago
User 1: BFD
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
UDLD? More like 'Utterly Disappointing Link Delay'. BFD is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Otis
1 year ago
Fast hellos could also work, but BFD is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
1 year ago
I agree, UDLD doesn't seem reliable enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 year ago
BFD is definitely the better option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anna
1 year ago
Carrier delay? Is this a networking exam or a transportation logistics course? I'm going with BFD for the win.
upvoted 0 times
Shawna
1 year ago
User 4: Shawna, BFD is the right choice to meet the convergence time requirement without impacting network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 year ago
User 3: Tasia, I agree with Ahmed. We should go with BFD for the win.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
1 year ago
User 2: Tasia, it's a networking exam. We need to ensure convergence time during a link failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
1 year ago
User 1: Carrier delay? Is this a networking exam or a transportation logistics course?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kara
1 year ago
Fast hellos, huh? Sounds like a great way to annoy the network admin and get a ticket to the IT helpdesk.
upvoted 0 times
Emile
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
King
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chi
1 year ago
I disagree. I believe fast hellos would be a better solution as it can also help maintain overall network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 year ago
A 200ms convergence time? That's faster than my daily commute! BFD seems like the obvious choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
1 year ago
User 4: BFD it is then, thanks for the input everyone!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, BFD is the best option for meeting the 200ms requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, BFD is the way to go for fast convergence time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
1 year ago
User 1: BFD
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louvenia
1 year ago
I agree with Shaniqua. BFD is the best option for ensuring fast convergence time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
1 year ago
I think the architect should select BFD.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel