Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 2 Question 91 Discussion

Refer to Exhibit.PC2 is directly connected to R1. A user at PC2 cannot Telnet to 2001:db8:a:b::10. The user can ping2001:db8:a:b::10 and receive DHCP-related information from the DHCP server. Which action resolvesthe issue?
D) Remove sequence 40 and put it back as sequence 15.
A) Remove sequence 10 and put it back as sequence 25.
B) Remove sequence 20 and put it back as sequence 45.
C) Remove sequence 30 and put it back as sequence 5.

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 2 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 2
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to Exhibit.

PC2 is directly connected to R1. A user at PC2 cannot Telnet to 2001:db8:a:b::10. The user can ping

2001:db8:a:b::10 and receive DHCP-related information from the DHCP server. Which action resolves

the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Cristal at Jun 22, 2024, 07:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carey
9 months ago
Sequence 40 sounds like a good candidate to check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
9 months ago
Surprised that ping works but Telnet doesn't!
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
10 months ago
Not so sure about that, could be sequence 20 instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
10 months ago
I think it's definitely sequence 10 that needs to be moved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
10 months ago
Sequence numbers matter in routing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
10 months ago
I think the key is in the sequence numbers, but I’m uncertain if it should be sequence 10 or 30 that needs to be adjusted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
11 months ago
I feel like removing sequence 40 could help, but I can't recall if that was the right approach in the practice scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
11 months ago
This seems similar to a practice question I did where we had to adjust sequence numbers to allow traffic. I think it might be sequence 20?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
11 months ago
I remember something about sequence numbers affecting access lists, but I'm not sure which one to change here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. The issue is with the Telnet connection, not the DHCP or ping, so I need to focus on that. Let me think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The user can ping the IP address, but can't Telnet to it. I wonder what that could mean and how to fix it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
11 months ago
This one seems tricky, but I think I can figure it out. Let me carefully review the details in the question and the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
11 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. The information provided seems a bit limited. I'll have to make an educated guess and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the configuration and think through the requirements to ensure the "device-context x" command always succeeds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky MPLS question. I'll need to carefully analyze the network topology and the RSVP-TE LSP configuration to determine the appropriate NNHOP backup tunnels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about coordination issues. I'll think through the options carefully and try to identify the most likely outcome when actors don't synchronize.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
11 months ago
I think we need to cover all the critical risks, so I'm leaning towards four test conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
1 year ago
I'm going to go with B. Removing sequence 20 and putting it back as sequence 45 sounds like the most logical solution to me. Let's hope the exam gods are feeling generous today!
upvoted 0 times
Melinda
1 year ago
Fingers crossed that B is the correct answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 year ago
I agree, B seems like the most logical option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
1 year ago
I think B is the right choice too. Let's hope for the best!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brinda
1 year ago
Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm scratching my head trying to figure it out. Maybe the answer is hidden in some obscure networking protocol that no one knows about except the exam writers.
upvoted 0 times
Leah
1 year ago
D) Remove sequence 40 and put it back as sequence 15.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
1 year ago
Let's try one of the options and see if it resolves the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
C) Remove sequence 30 and put it back as sequence 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
1 year ago
I think removing and rearranging the sequences might do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
1 year ago
Maybe we should focus on the sequence numbers and their order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
B) Remove sequence 20 and put it back as sequence 45.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 year ago
A) Remove sequence 10 and put it back as sequence 25.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josephine
1 year ago
Hmm, the question mentions that the user can ping the IP address and receive DHCP-related information, so the problem doesn't seem to be with the IP configuration. I'm leaning towards D, removing sequence 40 and putting it back as sequence 15.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C. Removing sequence 30 and putting it back as sequence 5 should resolve the issue with the Telnet connection.
upvoted 0 times
Jeniffer
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the correct action to take in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
1 year ago
Great, it seems like we all agree on choosing option C to resolve the Telnet connection problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
1 year ago
I would go with option C as well. It makes sense to adjust the sequence numbers to resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the correct action to take in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
1 year ago
I think you're right. Removing sequence 30 and putting it back as sequence 5 should fix the Telnet issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
1 year ago
I think you're right. Removing sequence 30 and putting it back as sequence 5 should fix the Telnet issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keith
1 year ago
But wouldn't removing sequence 40 and putting it back as sequence 15 also fix the problem?
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe removing sequence 20 and putting it back as sequence 45 is the correct action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
1 year ago
I think the issue can be resolved by removing sequence 30 and putting it back as sequence 5.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel