Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 2 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam

Question #: 82
Topic #: 2

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit A network administrator is troubleshooting to reduce the routing table of R4 and R5 to learn only the default route to communicate from Inter-Area and Intra-Area networks Which configuration resolves the issue?

AOption A

BOption B

COption C

DOption D

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Glenn at Feb 12, 2024, 08:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alex

9 months ago

Just a heads up, default routes can simplify routing tables significantly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

9 months ago

I’m surprised they didn’t mention summarization techniques!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

10 months ago

Did anyone else notice how complex this setup looks?

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslie

10 months ago

I disagree, I think Option D might work better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jessenia

10 months ago

Option B is the best choice for reducing the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

10 months ago

I vaguely remember that we should be looking for a configuration that minimizes routes. I think Option A could be a contender, but I'm not entirely confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

11 months ago

I feel like Option C might be the right choice since it seems to focus on inter-area communication, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Launa

11 months ago

I think we had a similar practice question about summarizing routes. I might lean towards Option B, but I can't recall the exact details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

11 months ago

I remember we discussed how to reduce routing tables in class, but I'm not sure which option specifically addresses the default route issue here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorcas

11 months ago

This seems straightforward. Based on the network topology, I believe Option B is the correct answer as it configures OSPF area 0 and area 1 to summarize routes, which should reduce the routing table size on R4 and R5.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

11 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. The key is to identify the appropriate OSPF configuration to limit the routes learned by R4 and R5 to just the default route. I'll carefully consider each option and try to apply my OSPF knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antione

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different options. I'll need to review the OSPF concepts and compare the configurations to see which one best addresses the issue of reducing the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casandra

11 months ago

This looks like a tricky OSPF routing question. I'll need to carefully analyze the network topology and configurations to determine the best way to reduce the routing table size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

11 months ago

I've worked with Fusionsphere before, and I'm pretty sure the snapshot files are stored on a dedicated Snapshot LUN. That seems like the most logical place for them to be kept. I'll go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

11 months ago

I think one of the functions might be listing routes to a particular destination. That seems familiar.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know it has to do with Decision Server Rules on WebSphere Liberty Profile, but I'm not familiar with the different archive names. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julieta

11 months ago

For similar practice questions, I think I saw that scaling is usually based on user numbers and application demand—could that be why 32 cores seems reasonable?

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivienne

11 months ago

Okay, I've got a plan. I'll focus on the health check endpoint and how the different options would interact with that. I think I can eliminate a couple of the options pretty quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlton

2 years ago

It's interesting to see different opinions on which configuration is the best. Everyone has their own rationale behind their choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

2 years ago

I personally think Option A is the best choice. It seems to have the most optimized configuration to achieve the desired result.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winifred

2 years ago

That's true, Option B could also be a valid choice. It seems to only have default route information as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sueann

2 years ago

But what about Option B? It also looks like it could work to reduce the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlton

2 years ago

I agree with you. Option C seems to only have the default route information for Inter-Area and Intra-Area networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winifred

2 years ago

I think the correct configuration to reduce the routing table of R4 and R5 is Option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

German

2 years ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about Option D. Configuring OSPF area 0 and setting the summary-address seems a bit more complicated than the other options.

upvoted 0 times

Gracia

2 years ago

Great choice. Option C should help reduce the routing table effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaunna

2 years ago

Let's go with Option C then. It seems to be the most suitable option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

2 years ago

I agree, configuring OSPF area 0 for Option D seems a bit complex.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linsey

2 years ago

Yeah, Option C looks like a good choice to learn only the default route.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maybelle

2 years ago

I think Option B might work better for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carri

2 years ago

Option A seems like a simpler solution to reduce the routing table.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chanel

2 years ago

Option C also seems like a good choice, with the OSPF area 0 and default-information originate commands. But I'm not 100% sure it would work as well as Option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Graham

2 years ago

I'm leaning towards Option B, as it looks like it would configure a default route on R4 and R5, which should help reduce the size of their routing tables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

2 years ago

This question is a real head-scratcher! The network topology seems pretty complex, and it's not easy to tell which configuration would be the best to reduce the routing table on R4 and R5.

upvoted 0 times

...