Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

An engineer is creating a policy that overrides normal routing behavior.if the route to a destination of10.100.100.0/24 is withdrawn from the routingTable, the policy must direct traffic to a next hop of 10.1 1.1. if the route is present in the routing table, thennormal forwarding must occur. Whichconfiguration meets the requirements?
D) access-list 100 permit ip any 10.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 ! route map POLICY permit 10 match ip address 100 Set ip next-hop recursive 10.1.1.1 ! route-map POLICY permit 20
A) access-list 100 permit ip any any ! route-map POLICY permit 10 match ip address 100 set ip next-hop recursive 10.1.1.1
B) access-list 100 permit ip any 10.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 ! Route-map POLICY permit 10 match ip address 100 set ip default next-hop 10.1.1.1
C) access-list 100 permit ip any 10.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 ! route-map POLICY permit 10 match ip address 100 set ip next-hop 10.1.1.1 ! route map POLICY permit 20

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 2
[All 300-410 Questions]

An engineer is creating a policy that overrides normal routing behavior.if the route to a destination of

10.100.100.0/24 is withdrawn from the routing

Table, the policy must direct traffic to a next hop of 10.1 1.1. if the route is present in the routing table, then

normal forwarding must occur. Which

configuration meets the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Jaclyn at Aug 04, 2022, 03:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gaston
10 months ago
B seems off, it doesn't cover the withdrawal scenario properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
10 months ago
A is definitely not it, too broad!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
10 months ago
Wait, does "recursive" really matter in this case?
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
11 months ago
I think D is the right choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
11 months ago
Option C looks solid to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
11 months ago
I remember that the access-list needs to match the specific subnet, but I’m not sure if I should go with option B or C. They both seem to have similar structures, but I can't tell which one meets the requirements better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between "set ip next-hop" and "set ip default next-hop." I think I saw that in a practice exam, but I can't remember which one was correct for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to set a next-hop based on route availability. I feel like option D might be the one, but I can't recall if "set ip next-hop recursive" is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
11 months ago
I think the key here is that the policy should only kick in when the route is withdrawn. I remember something about recursive next-hop, but I'm not sure if that's the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
11 months ago
Rate anticipation with maturity mismatch sounds like the right approach here. I'll walk through the logic and make sure I can explain why that's the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
11 months ago
Nominal group technique sounds perfect here - it ensures every team member gets an equal chance to contribute their perspective on these coding error reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. ROUND would make 12.99 become 13.0 and 15.44 become 15.4, so that seems like the right answer. I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to use the REVOKE statement and specify the exact privileges you want to remove (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) along with the table name (Employees) and the group (Group_2). I'm pretty confident option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The code seems to be doing some tricky formatting stuff, and I'm not 100% confident I understand how it all works together. I'll have to make an educated guess and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel