Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 13 Question 72 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit Which action fixes the OSPF routes redistribution into EIGRP?
C) Set a default metric in the route map
A) Match external type to type-1
B) Set tags before matching into EIGRP
D) Match OSPF and EIGR IDs

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 13 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 13
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit Which action fixes the OSPF routes redistribution into EIGRP?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Devora at Jul 03, 2023, 01:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alex
9 months ago
Definitely need to set tags before matching, so B makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
10 months ago
Wait, can you really match OSPF and EIGRP IDs? That sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
10 months ago
B seems like a solid approach too, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
10 months ago
I think A is actually the better option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
10 months ago
C is the right choice for setting a default metric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards D, but I can't recall if matching OSPF and EIGRP IDs is actually necessary for redistribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
11 months ago
I feel like I read something about tags being important for redistribution. Maybe B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where matching external types was crucial. Could it be A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
11 months ago
I think the answer might be C, setting a default metric in the route map, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
11 months ago
This seems like a good opportunity to demonstrate my Salesforce development skills. I'm confident I can identify the right solution to meet the company's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
11 months ago
Wait, I think I remember something about "Service Loose Coupling" being important, but I'm not sure it fits this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is C - relating the product features to customer value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the differences between the site types. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand this properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
1 year ago
Hmm, Option A sounds like it's trying to match apples to oranges. I bet the network admin who set this up is already pulling their hair out!
upvoted 0 times
Jeannine
1 year ago
User 3: Matching OSPF and EIGR IDs could also solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
User 2: I think setting a default metric in the route map might be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 year ago
User 1: Option A does seem a bit off, but it might work in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawnda
1 year ago
Hold on, I thought OSPF and EIGRP were like oil and water, mixing them up is just asking for trouble! Option D seems like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Detra
1 year ago
User 4: Matching external type to type-1 might be a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
1 year ago
User 3: Setting tags before matching into EIGRP seems like a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it could cause some serious issues with routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, mixing OSPF and EIGRP IDs sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 year ago
Matching OSPF and EIGR IDs might be the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
1 year ago
I think setting a default metric in the route map could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
1 year ago
But what about setting tags before matching into EIGRP?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
1 year ago
Option A) Match external type to type-1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viki
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option B, setting tags before matching into EIGRP could help distinguish the OSPF routes and ensure proper redistribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. Let's discuss further to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Set a default metric in the route map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 year ago
Option C looks promising, setting a default metric in the route map seems like a logical approach to fix the OSPF routes redistribution issue.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
1 year ago
D) Match OSPF and EIGR IDs
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
1 year ago
C) Set a default metric in the route map
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
1 year ago
B) Set tags before matching into EIGRP
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
1 year ago
A) Match external type to type-1
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, setting a default metric in the route map makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 year ago
User 1: I think option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Match external type to type-1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
1 year ago
But setting a default metric in the route map makes more sense because it directly impacts the redistribution process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) Match external type to type-1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C) Set a default metric in the route map.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel