Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-410 Topic 13 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 13
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit Which action fixes the OSPF routes redistribution into EIGRP?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Devora at Jul 03, 2023, 01:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Yesenia
2 months ago
Hmm, Option A sounds like it's trying to match apples to oranges. I bet the network admin who set this up is already pulling their hair out!
upvoted 0 times
Jeannine
1 months ago
User 3: Matching OSPF and EIGR IDs could also solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
2 months ago
User 2: I think setting a default metric in the route map might be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
2 months ago
User 1: Option A does seem a bit off, but it might work in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawnda
3 months ago
Hold on, I thought OSPF and EIGRP were like oil and water, mixing them up is just asking for trouble! Option D seems like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Detra
18 days ago
User 4: Matching external type to type-1 might be a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
22 days ago
User 3: Setting tags before matching into EIGRP seems like a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
23 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it could cause some serious issues with routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
25 days ago
User 1: I agree, mixing OSPF and EIGRP IDs sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 months ago
Matching OSPF and EIGR IDs might be the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 months ago
I think setting a default metric in the route map could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
2 months ago
But what about setting tags before matching into EIGRP?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
2 months ago
Option A) Match external type to type-1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viki
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B, setting tags before matching into EIGRP could help distinguish the OSPF routes and ensure proper redistribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
3 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. Let's discuss further to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Set a default metric in the route map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
3 months ago
Option C looks promising, setting a default metric in the route map seems like a logical approach to fix the OSPF routes redistribution issue.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
1 months ago
D) Match OSPF and EIGR IDs
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
2 months ago
C) Set a default metric in the route map
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
2 months ago
B) Set tags before matching into EIGRP
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
2 months ago
A) Match external type to type-1
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, setting a default metric in the route map makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
2 months ago
User 1: I think option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Match external type to type-1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
3 months ago
But setting a default metric in the route map makes more sense because it directly impacts the redistribution process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) Match external type to type-1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) Set a default metric in the route map.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel