Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 12 Question 110 Discussion

Posted by Penney on Apr 06, 2025 at 12:24 AM

Refer to the exhibit.

ISP 1 and ISP 2 directly connect to the Internet. A customer is tracking both ISP links to

achieve redundancy and cannot see the Cisco IOS IP SLA tracking output on the router console. Which command is missing from the IP SLA configuration?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
PA
Paulina 10 months ago
Surprised this is even a question, thought it was common knowledge!
WI
Wilbert 10 months ago
I’m not so sure about that, could it be "Start-time 0"?
LI
Lisandra 11 months ago
"Start-time 00:00" seems like a valid option too.
DA
Darrin 11 months ago
Definitely "Start-time immediately" for sure!
SU
Susy 11 months ago
I think the missing command is "Start-time now".
KI
Kirby 11 months ago
I’m leaning towards "start-time immediately," but I’m not completely confident. I wish I had reviewed that section more thoroughly!
RE
Ressie 11 months ago
I feel like "start-time now" makes sense, but I also have a vague memory of "immediately" being used in other configurations.
KA
Kattie 12 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where "start-time" was crucial, but I can't recall if it was "immediately" or "now."
DY
Dyan 12 months ago
I remember that the IP SLA needs to be started immediately to track the links properly, but I'm not sure which command exactly does that.
AV
Avery 1 year ago
I'm not too familiar with IP SLA, so this question is a bit challenging for me. I'll need to review my notes and try to apply the concepts to figure out the right answer. Hopefully I can eliminate a couple options and make an educated guess.
AL
Alpha 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The missing command is probably related to the start-time of the IP SLA operation. The options mention different start-time settings, so I'll need to determine which one is the correct one to allow the customer to see the tracking output.
AN
Anglea 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It mentions the customer can't see the IP SLA tracking output, but doesn't explicitly state what the issue is. I'll need to carefully review the options to figure out which command is missing.
KE
Kerry 1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward IP SLA configuration question. I think the key is to identify the missing command that would allow the customer to see the tracking output on the router console.
NE
Nenita 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused. Why not just use a magic 8-ball to decide the answer? It'd be just as reliable as some of these other options. D. Start-time now, I guess?
MI
Miesha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nenita
I'm not sure, maybe we should consult the magic 8-ball after all.
TE
Tess 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nenita
But wouldn't it make more sense to use A?
GE
Genevive 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nenita
No, I believe it's actually C.
DA
Darnell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nenita
I think D is the correct answer.
LE
Lenita 1 year ago
D. Start-time now, for sure. Who has time to wait for a specific start time when the customer is already having issues? Get that IP SLA tracking going ASAP!
WH
Whitley 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lenita
Let's make sure to add that command in the configuration.
IS
Isaiah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lenita
Agreed, the customer needs that redundancy ASAP.
LE
Leota 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lenita
Start-time now, definitely. Time is of the essence here.
PA
Paulina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lenita
D) Start-time now
NA
Nada 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lenita
C) Start-time immediately
GL
Glennis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lenita
B) Start-time 0
SA
Sage 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lenita
A) Start-time 00:00
GA
Galen 1 year ago
I'm going with C. Start-time immediately. It's the most straightforward way to start the IP SLA tracking right away.
AN
Anissa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Galen
User1: Well, let's test it out and see which one works.
JA
Janessa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Galen
User2: I disagree, I believe Start-time immediately is the best option.
RA
Rasheeda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Galen
User1: I think Start-time 0 is the correct command to use.
MI
Mi 1 year ago
I agree with Aja, Start-time immediately makes more sense for tracking the ISP links.
NI
Nieves 2 years ago
I think the answer is D. Start-time now. The question mentions that the customer can't see the IP SLA tracking output, so the start-time needs to be immediate.
QU
Quentin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
So, the correct answer is C. Start-time immediately.
RI
Rickie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
That's a good point. The customer needs to ensure the start-time is set to immediately for accurate tracking.
SA
Santos 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
But what if there is a delay in the start-time? Wouldn't that affect the tracking?
DO
Dorothea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
I agree, the start-time should be immediate for the customer to see the IP SLA tracking output.
MI
Misty 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
True, it's important to consider the customer's specific needs when configuring IP SLA tracking.
MA
Maile 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
That's a good point. It depends on whether the customer needs immediate tracking or if they can wait.
HE
Helaine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
But what if the customer wants to schedule the start-time for later? Maybe option A or B could work in that case.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
I agree with you. The start-time should be immediate for the customer to see the tracking output.
AJ
Aja 2 years ago
I believe it could be Start-time immediately.
MI
Mi 2 years ago
I think the missing command is Start-time now.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel