Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 11 Question 105 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.R1 has a route map configured, which results in a loss of partial IPv6 prefixes for the BGP neighbor, resulting in service degradation. How can the full service be restored?
A) The neighbor requires a soft reconfiguration, and this will clear the policy without resetting the BGP TCP connection.
B) The prefix lit requires all prefixes that R1 is advertising to be added to it, and this will allow additional prefixes to be advertised.
C) The route map requires a deny 20 statement without set conditions, and this will allow additional prefixes to be advertised.
D) The route map requires a permit 20 statement without set conditions, and this will allow additional prefixes to be advertised.

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 11 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 11
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

R1 has a route map configured, which results in a loss of partial IPv6 prefixes for the BGP neighbor, resulting in service degradation. How can the full service be restored?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In OSPF (Open Shortest Path First), the MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) size must match on both sides of a link for OSPF neighbors to form an adjacency12.If the MTU sizes do not match, the OSPF adjacency will not form, and the routers will not become neighbors12.

In this case, R1 cannot establish a neighbor relationship with R2.One possible reason for this could be a mismatch in the MTU size on the interfaces of R1 and R212.

To resolve this issue, you can configure themtu ignorecommand on the interfaces of R1 and R2 (Option A).This command allows OSPF to ignore the MTU size when determining if it can form an adjacency with a neighbor12.This means that even if the MTU sizes do not match, OSPF will still form an adjacency, and R1 and R2 will become neighbors12.


OSPF MTU Mismatch - NetworkLessons.com

Understanding OSPF MTU Mismatch Conditions and Solutions - Cisco

by Alana at Jan 10, 2025, 05:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Curtis
9 months ago
Soft reconfiguration is a solid choice too, but B might be better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
9 months ago
Option D seems too vague, not sure it would work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure about option C? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
10 months ago
Definitely agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
10 months ago
I think option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
10 months ago
The permit statement sounds familiar, but I’m uncertain if it’s the right one for restoring full service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
11 months ago
I feel like the deny statement could be the answer, but I can't recall the exact conditions we discussed in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
11 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to adjust the route map. Maybe it's about adding prefixes to the list?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
11 months ago
I remember something about soft reconfiguration, but I'm not sure if that's the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
11 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think the solution is in the route map. I'd start by looking at the "deny 20" statement and see if I can modify it to allow the missing prefixes to be advertised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The key seems to be the route map configuration on R1. I'll need to analyze the route map and see if I can find a way to restore the full service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions a loss of partial IPv6 prefixes, so I'll need to carefully review the BGP neighbor configuration and the route map to see where the issue is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
11 months ago
This looks like a classic BGP policy issue. I'd start by checking the route map configuration on R1 and see if I can identify the problem there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
1 year ago
Haha, this question is like a BGP Haiku - short, sweet, and full of hidden traps. Better choose wisely, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Azzie
1 year ago
D) The route map requires a permit 20 statement without set conditions, and this will allow additional prefixes to be advertised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 year ago
B) The prefix list requires all prefixes that R1 is advertising to be added to it, and this will allow additional prefixes to be advertised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
1 year ago
A) The neighbor requires a soft reconfiguration, and this will clear the policy without resetting the BGP TCP connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mabel
1 year ago
Wait, isn't option D just the opposite of what we want? Shouldn't we be restricting the route map, not allowing everything through?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
1 year ago
Hmm, the 'deny 20' option sounds a bit risky. I'd go with the 'permit 20' approach to open things up without any unintended consequences.
upvoted 0 times
Jenifer
1 year ago
Let's go with the 'permit 20' statement to restore the full service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
1 year ago
Agreed, the 'deny 20' option might cause more issues than it solves.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
1 year ago
I think so too, it's better to allow additional prefixes to be advertised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
1 year ago
I agree, the 'permit 20' option seems like the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vilma
1 year ago
I'm not sure adding all prefixes to the prefix list is a good idea - that could potentially overload the router. The route map solution seems safer.
upvoted 0 times
Edna
1 year ago
User 3: The neighbor requires a soft reconfiguration to clear the policy without resetting the BGP TCP connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, adding all prefixes could overload the router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
1 year ago
User 1: I think the route map solution is safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A makes sense because it mentions clearing the policy without disrupting the connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
1 year ago
I agree with Elouise, a soft reconfiguration should clear the policy without resetting the BGP TCP connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) The neighbor requires a soft reconfiguration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 year ago
The soft reconfiguration option seems like the quickest and cleanest way to restore full service without interrupting the BGP connection.
upvoted 0 times
Bettina
1 year ago
C) I think adding a deny statement to the route map without set conditions might also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
1 year ago
A) That could work too, but the soft reconfiguration seems like the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
1 year ago
B) But wouldn't adding all prefixes that R1 is advertising to the prefix list also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 year ago
A) The neighbor requires a soft reconfiguration, and this will clear the policy without resetting the BGP TCP connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel