Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 10 Question 89 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.R1 is being monitored using SNMP and monitoring devices are getting only partial information. What action should be taken to resolve this issue?
C) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP.
A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
B) Modify the access list to include snmptrap.
D) Modify the access list to add a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp

Cisco 300-410 Exam - Topic 10 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-410 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 10
[All 300-410 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

R1 is being monitored using SNMP and monitoring devices are getting only partial information. What action should be taken to resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

IP SLA (Internet Protocol Service Level Agreement) is a feature that allows you to measure network performance such as latency, jitter, packet loss, and so on.In this case, it's being used to monitor the reachability of a next hop on a router123.

When the next hop is unreachable, the router is executing tracking and failing over to another route. However, packet loss is experienced because the reachability is flapping. This could be due to the router switching back and forth between the primary and backup routes too quickly.

To resolve this issue, you can introduce a delay in the tracking process. This can be done by appending a delay to the track command.Option C suggests appending a delay of 50 seconds for the up state and 60 seconds for the down state45. This means that the router will wait for 50 seconds before declaring the tracked object as up (reachable) and 60 seconds before declaring it as down (unreachable).This delay can help prevent the router from switching routes too quickly, thus reducing the chances of reachability flapping and packet loss45.


Configure ISP Failover with Default Routes Using IP SLA Tracking - Cisco

Using IPSLA to change routing - Cisco Community

How to Use IP SLA Technology to Assess WAN Performance

Reliable Static Routing with IP SLA - NetworkLessons.com

Configuring Static Route Tracking using IP SLA (Basic)

by Buck at May 23, 2024, 02:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Felicitas
9 months ago
Increasing the exceeded limit might help too, worth considering!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
9 months ago
Definitely need to check the access list for snmptrap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
10 months ago
Surprised that CoPP settings can limit SNMP info like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
10 months ago
I disagree, modifying the access list seems more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
10 months ago
Looks like increasing the CIR limit for SNMP is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between the exceeded limit and the CIR limit in CoPP. I hope I can remember which one to modify for SNMP issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to adjust access lists for SNMP, so I feel like option D might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
11 months ago
I think modifying the access list to include snmptrap could be a good option, but I need to double-check if that's really necessary for monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
11 months ago
I remember something about CoPP policies affecting SNMP traffic, but I'm not sure if it's about the exceeded limit or the CIR limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options seem a bit similar, but I think I'd go with modifying the CoPP policy to increase the SNMP CIR limit. That seems like the most direct way to address the issue of partial information being received.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question says the monitoring devices are only getting partial information, so it's likely an issue with the SNMP traffic being restricted somehow. I'd start by checking the CoPP policy and see if that's the culprit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Is the issue that the monitoring devices are not receiving all the SNMP data they need? If so, then modifying the access list to allow the SNMP trap traffic might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
11 months ago
I think the key here is to look at the CoPP policy and see if the SNMP traffic is being rate-limited. Modifying the CoPP policy to increase the CIR limit for SNMP seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
11 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The two frame environment delivery models are Frame on HP running Hyper-V and Frame on Cisco LICS running VMware ESXi. I'll select those two options and move on to the next question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
11 months ago
I think the residual plots would be the best option here. That would let me visually see if the model is over or underestimating the target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
11 months ago
I have a feeling it's constraints and objects, but it's been hard to keep track of all these definitions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. With the given conditions, I can see there are 8 possible test cases that need to be covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
1 year ago
Honestly, I'd just unplug the whole thing and see if it comes back to life. That's the IT way, right?
upvoted 0 times
Hyun
1 year ago
User 3: I think modifying the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP might also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that could help. Or maybe modify the access list to include snmptrap?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
1 year ago
User 1: Maybe try modifying the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaiah
1 year ago
Ahh, the classic SNMP conundrum. I say we just throw a few more routers at it and see what happens. Worked for me last time!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
1 year ago
The access list needs some love, too. Adding a line to allow UDP any any eq SNMP should do the trick. Gotta love those network protocols, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Deandrea
1 year ago
User 3: Network protocols can be tricky, but once you get them right, it's smooth sailing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that should definitely help with getting the full information from SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should modify the access list to add a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Douglass
1 year ago
C) is the way to go. Increase the CIR limit for SNMP and you should be good to go. Simple as that!
upvoted 0 times
Ranee
1 year ago
C) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
1 year ago
B) Modify the access list to include snmptrap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
1 year ago
A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karrie
1 year ago
Ah, I see. Modifying the access list to include SNMP trap might be the way to go. Gotta love those traps!
upvoted 0 times
Dorinda
1 year ago
User 4: Or adding a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp in the access list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
1 year ago
User 3: Maybe modifying the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that could help in getting the complete information from R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
1 year ago
User 1: I think modifying the access list to include snmptrap is the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlota
1 year ago
Hmm, the CoPP policy seems to be the culprit here. Increasing the SNMP limit should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Alba
1 year ago
D) Modify the access list to add a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
1 year ago
C) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
1 year ago
C) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured CIR limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
1 year ago
A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 year ago
B) Modify the access list to include snmptrap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
1 year ago
A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D) Modify the access list to add a second line to allow udp any any eq snmp could also be a valid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
1 year ago
I agree with Alyce, increasing the limit for SNMP in the CoPP policy should resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Modify the CoPP policy to increase the configured exceeded limit for SNMP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel