Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-215 Exam - Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.A security analyst notices unusual connections while monitoring traffic. What is the attack vector, and which action should be taken to prevent this type of event?
D) MAC flooding; assign static entries
A) DNS spoofing; encrypt communication protocols
B) SYN flooding, block malicious packets
C) ARP spoofing; configure port security

Cisco 300-215 Exam - Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-215 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All 300-215 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A security analyst notices unusual connections while monitoring traffic. What is the attack vector, and which action should be taken to prevent this type of event?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Jose at Mar 01, 2023, 09:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-215 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Zachary
9 months ago
I agree with Rasheeda, ARP spoofing fits the bill here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure about ARP? Seems a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
10 months ago
Definitely SYN flooding, blocking those packets is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
10 months ago
I think it’s actually MAC flooding, static entries are a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
10 months ago
Looks like it's ARP spoofing, configuring port security is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
10 months ago
MAC flooding seems familiar, and I recall that assigning static entries can help mitigate it. Could option D be the answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
11 months ago
I think DNS spoofing was covered in our last class, but I'm confused about whether encrypting communication protocols would really help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like SYN flooding was mentioned in a practice question. Blocking malicious packets sounds like a good preventive measure, so maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
11 months ago
I remember studying about ARP spoofing and how it can lead to man-in-the-middle attacks. I think option C might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
11 months ago
Easy peasy! Enabling automatic failover and being less expensive than traditional backup are the two big wins for HPE Recovery Manager Central.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the diagram and think through the load balancing concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
1 year ago
ARP spoofing, eh? I bet the answer is to just assign static MAC addresses and call it a day. Keeping those hackers on their toes, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Sherron
1 year ago
A: Assigning static MAC addresses can help, but configuring port security is more effective in preventing ARP spoofing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
1 year ago
B: Really? I thought assigning static MAC addresses would be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
1 year ago
A: Actually, the best action to prevent ARP spoofing is to configure port security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
I don't know, this question seems a bit fishy. Maybe they're trying to hook us with a red herring? Better go with the option that smells the least fishy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
1 year ago
Looks like a classic ARP spoofing attack to me. Configuring port security is the way to stop these pesky hackers in their tracks!
upvoted 0 times
Selene
1 year ago
User 4: Encrypting communication protocols can also help prevent these attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, we need to block those malicious packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, configuring port security is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
1 year ago
User 1: I think it's an ARP spoofing attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
1 year ago
SYN flooding can be blocked by filtering out malicious packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
1 year ago
But wouldn't encrypting communication protocols help prevent DNS spoofing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
1 year ago
I think we should assign static entries to prevent MAC flooding instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
1 year ago
I agree, ARP spoofing is a common attack. Configuring port security is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Moon
1 year ago
Hmm, ARP spoofing seems like the obvious attack vector here. Port security is definitely the way to go to prevent this kind of event.
upvoted 0 times
Herman
1 year ago
Yes, configuring port security can help prevent ARP spoofing attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
1 year ago
I agree, ARP spoofing is a common attack. Port security is a good defense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kallie
1 year ago
I believe option C is the correct answer, ARP spoofing can be prevented by configuring port security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
I agree with Sharika, we should configure port security to prevent it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
1 year ago
I think the attack vector is ARP spoofing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel