Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 200-901 Exam - Topic 4 Question 62 Discussion

A developer is working on a new feature in a branch named 'newfeat123456789' and the current working primary branch is named 'prim987654321'. The developer requires a merge commit during a fast forward merge for record-keeping purposes. Which Git command must be used?
A) git merge --no-ff newfeat123456789
B) git commit --no-ff newfeat123456789
C) git add --commit-ff newfeat123456789
D) git reset --commit-ff newfeat123456789

Cisco 200-901 Exam - Topic 4 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 200-901 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 4
[All 200-901 Questions]

A developer is working on a new feature in a branch named 'newfeat123456789' and the current working primary branch is named 'prim987654321'. The developer requires a merge commit during a fast forward merge for record-keeping purposes. Which Git command must be used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Marti at Aug 29, 2023, 03:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 200-901 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lindsey
9 months ago
B is wrong, it's not a commit command for merging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
10 months ago
Wait, can you really force a merge commit like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
10 months ago
A is the right choice, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
10 months ago
I thought fast forward merges didn't create merge commits?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
10 months ago
It's definitely A, you need that --no-ff option for a merge commit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
11 months ago
I don't recall seeing --no-ff in any other commands besides merging, so I guess A is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the merge command is definitely involved. But I can't remember if it's A or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about using --no-ff for merges. It sounds like option A could be right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
11 months ago
I think the command we need is the one that prevents fast-forwarding, so maybe it's option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the concepts before I answer. Maybe I'll review my Git notes quickly before submitting my response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
11 months ago
Okay, I've got it! The correct answer is A, "git merge --no-ff newfeat123456789". This will perform a merge commit, even if it's a fast-forward merge, which is what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
11 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward Git question. I think the key is to understand the difference between a fast-forward merge and a merge commit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident in my Git knowledge, and I think option A is the correct answer here. The --no-ff flag is the way to go for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
11 months ago
Based on my understanding of Git, option A looks like the right choice. The --no-ff flag will force a merge commit, which is what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Can someone clarify what a "fast forward merge" means in this context?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
11 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer here. The key is that we need a merge commit, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the Git commands and how they work for merging branches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the requirement for a merge commit during a fast-forward merge. That doesn't seem quite right to me. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about how marketing users can access and edit converted leads, and the administrator has given them the necessary permissions. I'm thinking the global search and recent records options might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. Metasploit is all about exploiting systems and delivering payloads, so the correct answer is definitely B - Exploit and payload.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel