Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L5M3 Exam - Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

When there has been a major breach in a contract, the contract will be terminated. Is this statement true?
D) no- the contract can continue if the offending party proves that further breaches won't occur
A) yes- the contract will be terminated and damages sought
B) yes- the contract must be terminated as there is no means by which the contract could continue after a major breach
C) no- the contract can be affirmed by the injured party

CIPS L5M3 Exam - Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M3 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 1
[All L5M3 Questions]

When there has been a major breach in a contract, the contract will be terminated. Is this statement true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The correct answers are as follows:

This is litigation as it involves a legal team and it's public. Out of the 4 options only litigation is a public dispute resolution.


by Angella at Apr 01, 2023, 02:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L5M3 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ivory
10 months ago
Not always! Sometimes parties can negotiate and keep it going.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
10 months ago
I think the injured party can still affirm the contract, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
10 months ago
Wait, can a contract really continue after a major breach?
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
11 months ago
Totally agree, especially if the breach is serious!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
11 months ago
Yes, major breaches usually lead to termination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
11 months ago
I remember discussing how a party can sometimes continue the contract if they can prove no further breaches will happen. So maybe D could be a possibility too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B because a major breach usually means the contract is over, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
11 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question before, and I think it was about whether the injured party can still enforce the contract. Maybe option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
11 months ago
I think the statement is true, but I'm not sure if it applies to all situations. I remember something about affirming a contract after a breach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the Conceptual Framework's definition of a liability before I can confidently select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
11 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Is the question asking about the specific benefits of DevOps, or just what it generally achieves? I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the WAN deployment requirements for Cisco Unified Contact Center Express to determine the maximum round-trip time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 year ago
As someone who's been on the wrong end of a major breach, I can tell you C is the way to go. Nothing worse than being stuck in a bad deal. Affirm and move on, that's my advice!
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
1 year ago
C) no- the contract can be affirmed by the injured party
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
1 year ago
B) yes- the contract must be terminated as there is no means by which the contract could continue after a major breach
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
1 year ago
A) yes- the contract will be terminated and damages sought
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorriane
1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with C. Terminating a contract seems a bit extreme - give the offending party a chance to make it right, I say!
upvoted 0 times
Susy
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think C is the most fair option. It allows for the possibility of the contract being affirmed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe A is the correct answer. Terminating the contract and seeking damages is necessary after a major breach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
I think C is the best option. It's important to give the offending party a chance to fix things.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raelene
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say A is the way to go. Terminate the contract and go after damages. Why bother trying to keep a broken deal alive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
1 year ago
I'm going with B. If there's been a major breach, the contract has to end. No point in trying to salvage it at that point, right? Might as well start fresh.
upvoted 0 times
Elliot
1 year ago
C) no- the contract can be affirmed by the injured party
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
1 year ago
I agree with B. Once there's a major breach, it's hard to trust the other party again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
1 year ago
B) yes- the contract must be terminated as there is no means by which the contract could continue after a major breach
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
1 year ago
A) yes- the contract will be terminated and damages sought
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 year ago
True, but it might be risky to continue a contract after a major breach. It's a tough decision to make.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
1 year ago
I think that's a good point. If they can prove they won't breach again, maybe the contract can continue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
1 year ago
But what if the offending party promises not to breach the contract again? Could it still continue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
1 year ago
I agree with you, B seems like the most logical choice. Once there's a major breach, it's hard to trust the other party.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buddy
1 year ago
D sounds like the right answer to me. The contract can continue if the offending party can convince the other side that they won't breach again. Seems like a reasonable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is C. The injured party can choose to affirm the contract even after a major breach, rather than automatically terminating it.
upvoted 0 times
Melynda
1 year ago
D) no- the contract can continue if the offending party proves that further breaches won't occur
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
C) no- the contract can be affirmed by the injured party
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
1 year ago
B) yes- the contract must be terminated as there is no means by which the contract could continue after a major breach
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
1 year ago
A) yes- the contract will be terminated and damages sought
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
1 year ago
But what if the injured party decides to affirm the contract instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
1 year ago
I agree with Bettina, the contract must be terminated after a major breach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
1 year ago
I think the statement is true, the contract will be terminated.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel