New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L5M3 Exam - Topic 1 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M3 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 1
[All L5M3 Questions]

If an innocent party wishes to terminate a contract due to a breach, which of the following is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is 'only future obligations of the parties are excused and discharged' - all cur-rent and past obligations need to be fulfilled, or remedied (e.g. through liquidated damages). When an innocent party terminates a contract, they are still obliged to fulfil their own obligations. P.47


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Fanny
3 months ago
C seems off; the offending party's obligations aren't just wiped away.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
3 months ago
I didn't know that! Surprised to learn about these distinctions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
3 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it might be A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
4 months ago
Totally agree with you, B is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
I think it's B, all obligations of the innocent party are excused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
4 months ago
I believe the answer could be A, but I also recall something about past obligations being relevant in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether all obligations are excused or just the future ones. I feel like I need to review that part again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think it was about how the offending party's obligations are discharged too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
5 months ago
I think if the innocent party terminates the contract, it might only excuse future obligations, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. When a contract is breached, the innocent party can terminate the agreement, but the question is about what specific obligations are excused or discharged. I'll review the options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the nuances of contract termination due to breach. I'll need to think it through step-by-step to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
5 months ago
I think this question is testing our understanding of contract law and the consequences of a breach. I'll need to carefully consider the options and apply my knowledge of contract termination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. The distinctions between "future obligations," "all obligations," and "past obligations" are not entirely clear to me. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
1 year ago
Trick question! The answer is obviously A. You can't just get out of future obligations because of a breach. That would be way too easy.
upvoted 0 times
Cherry
1 year ago
I agree with Cherry, it's definitely A. Trick question indeed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 year ago
No, I believe it's A. Only future obligations of the parties are excused and discharged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
1 year ago
I think the answer is B. All obligations of the innocent party are excused and discharged.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Slyvia
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. But I think C makes the most sense - the offending party should be the one facing consequences, not the innocent party.
upvoted 0 times
Lashon
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer because the innocent party shouldn't have to fulfill any obligations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think C is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be fair for both parties to have their obligations excused?
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
1 year ago
I agree, C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
1 year ago
D is the correct answer. Only past obligations are excused, not future ones. Gotta love those tricky contract law questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 year ago
I'm going with C. The offending party should be the one whose obligations are excused and discharged, not the innocent one.
upvoted 0 times
Whitley
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D) only past obligations of the parties are excused and discharged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) all obligations of the offending party are excused and discharged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
I think it's A) only future obligations of the parties are excused and discharged.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Major
1 year ago
But doesn't it make more sense for the innocent party to be relieved of all obligations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
1 year ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice here. If the contract is terminated due to a breach, the innocent party should be fully relieved of their obligations.
upvoted 0 times
Burma
1 year ago
That's a good point. It's important to consider both parties' obligations when terminating a contract due to a breach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 year ago
I think only future obligations of the parties are excused and discharged, so option A might be the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 year ago
But what about the obligations of the offending party? Shouldn't they also be excused and discharged?
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
1 year ago
I agree, option B makes the most sense. The innocent party shouldn't have to fulfill any obligations if the contract is terminated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) all obligations of the offending party are excused and discharged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) all obligations of the innocent party are excused and discharged.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel