Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L5M3 Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Posted by Jerry on Dec 22, 2023 at 08:49 PM

Which of the following statements about 'Specific Performance' are TRUE? Select TWO.

Suggested Answer: A

1 is the correct answer. This is a direct quote from p. 104 of the study guide.


Get Premium L5M3 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
LE
Leontine 11 months ago
Totally agree with A and D, those are spot on!
MO
Monte 12 months ago
Wait, can they really get arrested for not complying? That sounds extreme!
BR
Brianne 12 months ago
B seems way off, there's nothing cheap about it.
RE
Rebeca 1 year ago
I think D is also true, gotta mitigate those losses.
CA
Carmen 1 year ago
A is definitely true, it can take forever!
MY
Myra 1 year ago
I have a vague memory that C is incorrect; I don't think you can get arrested for not fulfilling a specific performance order.
BI
Billy 1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think D is definitely true because the innocent party usually has to mitigate losses.
GI
Gilma 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like B can't be right since specific performance usually involves legal disputes that take time.
AH
Ahmed 1 year ago
I remember that specific performance can be quite complex, so I think A might be true about it being lengthy and costly.
RO
Royce 1 year ago
I think option C is false - I don't believe parties can be arrested for not complying with a specific performance order. The court would likely impose other penalties instead.
WI
Winfred 1 year ago
From what I remember, specific performance can be a lengthy and costly process, so I'm pretty confident that option A is true. But I'm not sure about the other statements.
JO
Jolene 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. I know specific performance is a remedy for breach of contract, but I'm not sure about the details on the process and costs.
CA
Carylon 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key points about specific performance before selecting my answers.
NU
Nu 1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I feel confident I can work through it. I'll start by looking at the "technical expertise" and "testing skills" sections to find the areas that need an expert.
KA
Katina 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know there are different search modes, but I can't recall all the names off the top of my head. I'll have to think this through carefully.
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
I've got this! The training and validation data channels are must-haves, and we also need to specify the IAM role. Easy peasy. I'm feeling good about this one.
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
Wait, they can arrest you for not doing a specific performance? That's like something out of a bad legal thriller. I guess it's true, though - the courts can get pretty serious about enforcing those orders.
UL
Ulysses 1 year ago
I think the key is understanding that specific performance is an equitable remedy, not a legal one. So B is definitely wrong, and D is only partially true. A and C seem to be the most accurate statements.
AN
Annabelle 1 year ago
Haha, I can just imagine someone getting arrested for not completing a specific performance. That would be quite a spectacle! But in all seriousness, A and C seem to be the best answers here.
FA
Fausto 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annabelle
I agree, A seems like a safe bet. Let's go with that for now.
AN
Antonio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annabelle
I think A is definitely true, but I'm not so sure about C. What do you think?
CA
Cathrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annabelle
Yeah, it does seem like a drastic consequence for not following through on a court order.
DO
Dorothea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annabelle
I know, it's hard to believe someone could actually get arrested for not completing a specific performance.
WI
Willow 1 year ago
I'm not so sure about B. Specific performance is usually a last resort, not a 'cheap and quick' solution. And D doesn't sound right either - the innocent party has a duty to mitigate losses, but that's a separate issue.
CO
Cordelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Willow
C) If a party is ordered to complete a 'Specific Performance' and doesn't, they can be arrested
JI
Jill 1 year ago
↳ replying to Willow
A) Orders for Specific Performance can be a lengthy and costly process
SH
Sharika 2 years ago
A and C seem like the correct options here. Specific performance can be a lengthy and costly process, and a party can face legal consequences for not complying with the order.
CA
Carla 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharika
Yes, it's important to consider the potential costs and consequences before seeking specific performance in a contract dispute.
SA
Sarah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharika
I agree, it can be a lengthy and expensive process to enforce specific performance.
AD
Adria 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharika
I think A and C are correct. Specific performance can be costly and failing to comply can lead to legal consequences.
DE
Denae 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think A and B make more sense to me.
AN
Angelica 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe B and D are the correct options.
LA
Lasandra 2 years ago
I think A and C are true.
LE
Levi 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think A and C make more sense to me.
TA
Tamra 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe B and D are the correct options.
TO
Tonette 2 years ago
I think A and C are true.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel