New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L5M3 Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M3 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All L5M3 Questions]

Which of the following statements about 'Specific Performance' are TRUE? Select TWO.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

1 is the correct answer. This is a direct quote from p. 104 of the study guide.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leontine
3 months ago
Totally agree with A and D, those are spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
3 months ago
Wait, can they really get arrested for not complying? That sounds extreme!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
4 months ago
B seems way off, there's nothing cheap about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
4 months ago
I think D is also true, gotta mitigate those losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
A is definitely true, it can take forever!
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
4 months ago
I have a vague memory that C is incorrect; I don't think you can get arrested for not fulfilling a specific performance order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think D is definitely true because the innocent party usually has to mitigate losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like B can't be right since specific performance usually involves legal disputes that take time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
5 months ago
I remember that specific performance can be quite complex, so I think A might be true about it being lengthy and costly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
5 months ago
I think option C is false - I don't believe parties can be arrested for not complying with a specific performance order. The court would likely impose other penalties instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
5 months ago
From what I remember, specific performance can be a lengthy and costly process, so I'm pretty confident that option A is true. But I'm not sure about the other statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. I know specific performance is a remedy for breach of contract, but I'm not sure about the details on the process and costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key points about specific performance before selecting my answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I feel confident I can work through it. I'll start by looking at the "technical expertise" and "testing skills" sections to find the areas that need an expert.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know there are different search modes, but I can't recall all the names off the top of my head. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
5 months ago
I've got this! The training and validation data channels are must-haves, and we also need to specify the IAM role. Easy peasy. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
9 months ago
Wait, they can arrest you for not doing a specific performance? That's like something out of a bad legal thriller. I guess it's true, though - the courts can get pretty serious about enforcing those orders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
9 months ago
I think the key is understanding that specific performance is an equitable remedy, not a legal one. So B is definitely wrong, and D is only partially true. A and C seem to be the most accurate statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
9 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine someone getting arrested for not completing a specific performance. That would be quite a spectacle! But in all seriousness, A and C seem to be the best answers here.
upvoted 0 times
Fausto
8 months ago
I agree, A seems like a safe bet. Let's go with that for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
8 months ago
I think A is definitely true, but I'm not so sure about C. What do you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
8 months ago
Yeah, it does seem like a drastic consequence for not following through on a court order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
8 months ago
I know, it's hard to believe someone could actually get arrested for not completing a specific performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willow
10 months ago
I'm not so sure about B. Specific performance is usually a last resort, not a 'cheap and quick' solution. And D doesn't sound right either - the innocent party has a duty to mitigate losses, but that's a separate issue.
upvoted 0 times
Cordelia
9 months ago
C) If a party is ordered to complete a 'Specific Performance' and doesn't, they can be arrested
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
9 months ago
A) Orders for Specific Performance can be a lengthy and costly process
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharika
10 months ago
A and C seem like the correct options here. Specific performance can be a lengthy and costly process, and a party can face legal consequences for not complying with the order.
upvoted 0 times
Carla
9 months ago
Yes, it's important to consider the potential costs and consequences before seeking specific performance in a contract dispute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
9 months ago
I agree, it can be a lengthy and expensive process to enforce specific performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
9 months ago
I think A and C are correct. Specific performance can be costly and failing to comply can lead to legal consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denae
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A and B make more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe B and D are the correct options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
10 months ago
I think A and C are true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A and C make more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe B and D are the correct options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
11 months ago
I think A and C are true.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel