Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L5M2 Exam - Topic 5 Question 64 Discussion

Posted by Alease on Nov 24, 2025 at 11:04 PM

Juan is a Spanish business owner who imports several parts from Japan. Juan's business operates in Euros and the parts that he buys from Japan can often take a long time to arrive, this means that the price of the items sometimes fluctuates due to the exchange rate. Which of the following would be the best option for Juan?

Suggested Answer: B

quoting in Juan's currency would reduce the risk to Juan - the risk of currency exchange rate fluctuations would then sit with the supplier. See p.23 for more information on currency risks.


Get Premium L5M2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
EL
Elenore 7 months ago
Terminating the contract is too drastic. Stick with B!
PA
Pansy 7 months ago
Option C seems complicated. Not sure it helps Juan.
MI
Ming 7 months ago
True, but option A could lead to more uncertainty.
BL
Blair 8 months ago
But what if the exchange rate changes?
DO
Dominque 8 months ago
Agreed, quoting in Euros helps with budgeting.
LI
Linn 8 months ago
Not sure if option C is practical for Juan's situation.
MO
Mohammad 9 months ago
Fluctuating prices can really hurt profit margins.
DA
Darell 9 months ago
Wait, why would he terminate the contract? Seems drastic!
GE
Geraldine 9 months ago
Option B makes the most sense to avoid exchange rate issues.
XE
Xenia 9 months ago
Option C is interesting, but it might be too complex for Juan's business. B is the way to go.
SH
Shannon 9 months ago
Haha, terminating the contract with the foreign supplier? That's a bit extreme, don't you think?
JO
Jospeh 9 months ago
I agree, having the supplier quote in Juan's currency is the most practical solution.
ME
Merlyn 10 months ago
I’m not confident, but I think terminating the contract might be too drastic unless the supplier is really unreliable.
MI
Michel 10 months ago
This question reminds me of a similar practice one where we talked about currency risk management. I feel like option B could be a safer choice for Juan.
JA
Jade 10 months ago
Terminating the contract with the foreign supplier (option D) seems a bit drastic. There must be a way for Ahmed to manage the exchange rate risk without having to completely change suppliers. I think options A or B would be better solutions.
AH
Ahmed 10 months ago
I would definitely go with option B. Quoting in my own currency gives me more control and stability over the pricing of the parts I need to import. The exchange rate fluctuations can be a real headache, so this seems like the best way to avoid that.
MA
Macy 10 months ago
Option C sounds interesting, but I'm not sure how that would work in practice. Matching geographical profiles of customer sales with supplier purchases seems like it could be complicated to implement.
GI
Giovanna 10 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice. That way Juan can better manage the exchange rate risk.
EM
Emeline 11 months ago
I remember discussing how quoting in the supplier's currency could expose Juan to more exchange rate risk, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option.
MA
Marya 11 months ago
I think option B is best. It reduces risk.
BA
Barbra 11 months ago
I think having the supplier quote in Juan's currency might help stabilize costs, but I can't recall if there are any downsides to that approach.
CL
Clorinda 11 months ago
I disagree, quoting in their currency could save costs.
WE
Wei 11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like there are a few different strategies Juan could use to manage the exchange rate risk. I'm not sure which one would be the "best" option.
LE
Lenita 12 months ago
I think option B would be the best choice for Juan. Having the supplier quote in his own currency would help him better manage the exchange rate risk and avoid fluctuations in the price of the parts.
RA
Raul 6 months ago
↳ replying to Lenita
True, but I still think B is safer.
LA
Lasandra 6 months ago
↳ replying to Lenita
Then option A could be a backup plan.
CA
Caitlin 7 months ago
↳ replying to Lenita
But what if the supplier refuses?
FR
Francesco 7 months ago
↳ replying to Lenita
Definitely! It simplifies budgeting.
RA
Raylene 7 months ago
↳ replying to Lenita
I agree, option B makes sense.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel