Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L5M2 Exam - Topic 2 Question 40 Discussion

Robot Ltd manufactures high end robots. A lot of value is tied up in the stock that it holds within its warehouse as each robot is worth several thousand pounds. The company has decided to enlist the services of a third party provider for disaster recovery, to help them shape a plan for if something were to happen to the stock, such as a flood. Is this the correct thing for Robot Ltd to do?
A) yes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise
B) yes- a third party is a cheap option for disaster recovery planning
C) no- Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team to draw up the plan as internal stakeholders will understand the risks better than a 3rd party
D) no - a 3rd party can only help in the solution stage of disaster recovery, not the planning stage

CIPS L5M2 Exam - Topic 2 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M2 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 2
[All L5M2 Questions]

Robot Ltd manufactures high end robots. A lot of value is tied up in the stock that it holds within its warehouse as each robot is worth several thousand pounds. The company has decided to enlist the services of a third party provider for disaster recovery, to help them shape a plan for if something were to happen to the stock, such as a flood. Is this the correct thing for Robot Ltd to do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is 1 - the 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise. They can advise on best practice and will know how to advise Robot Ltd as they will have experience across a wide range of companies. This is explained on p.91 of the study guide


by Ronny at Aug 28, 2024, 06:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L5M2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brynn
9 months ago
Not sure a 3rd party can really grasp all the nuances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
9 months ago
A third party is usually more cost-effective for planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
10 months ago
Surprised they’re not handling this in-house!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
10 months ago
I disagree, internal teams know the risks better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
10 months ago
A third party can definitely bring in fresh perspectives!
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
10 months ago
I think option D might be correct because it seems like third parties are more focused on implementation rather than the planning phase itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
11 months ago
I feel like there was a practice question similar to this, and it emphasized the value of having a mix of internal and external resources for disaster recovery planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think we also talked about the importance of internal teams knowing the specific risks better than outsiders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how third-party providers can bring in specialized knowledge, which might be beneficial for Robot Ltd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
11 months ago
This is a tricky one. On the surface, it seems like using a third-party provider could be beneficial, but the last option suggests that they may not be able to contribute much to the planning stage. I'll need to really think through the implications of each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to consider whether the third-party provider can bring valuable expertise and a broader perspective, or if the internal team would be better equipped to understand the specific risks. I'll need to analyze the options with that in mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking whether it's the correct thing for the company to do, but the options don't seem to give a clear-cut answer. I'll need to think through the reasoning behind each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the benefits of using a third-party provider for disaster recovery planning. I'll need to carefully weigh the pros and cons mentioned in the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
11 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The first two options highlight the potential advantages of using a third-party provider, while the last two options raise valid concerns. I'll need to weigh those factors carefully to determine the best approach for Robot Ltd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the XML schema and the requirements for Simple Validation Mode to determine which rule is being violated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
2 years ago
This question is a piece of cake! I'd go with option A - it's a no-brainer. Though I'm still trying to figure out what a 'robot' is. Are those the things that make the coffee in the breakroom?
upvoted 0 times
Yuonne
2 years ago
A) yes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
2 years ago
C) no- Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team to draw up the plan as internal stakeholders will understand the risks better than a 3rd party
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
2 years ago
A) yes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christoper
2 years ago
Hmm, option D actually makes a lot of sense. A third-party can only help with the solution, not the all-important planning phase.
upvoted 0 times
Devora
2 years ago
That's a good point. Internal stakeholders would have a better understanding of the risks involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
2 years ago
C) no- Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team to draw up the plan as internal stakeholders will understand the risks better than a 3rd party
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
2 years ago
A) yes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raymon
2 years ago
Nah, option C is the clear winner. No one knows the business better than the people who work there. A third-party just won't get it.
upvoted 0 times
Cammy
2 years ago
Exactly, they know the ins and outs better than anyone else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
2 years ago
True, internal stakeholders have a deeper understanding of the business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
2 years ago
C) no- Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team to draw up the plan as internal stakeholders will understand the risks better than a 3rd party
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
2 years ago
A) yes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eloisa
2 years ago
I think a third party can only help in the solution stage, not the planning stage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
2 years ago
I disagree, Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team for disaster recovery planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
2 years ago
I agree with Werner, a third party can provide broader experience and expertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
2 years ago
Option B seems like the most cost-effective choice. Who needs all that fancy internal planning when you can outsource it for cheap?
upvoted 0 times
Yolando
2 years ago
I disagree. We should have our own team handle it, they know our business best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
2 years ago
I think option B is the way to go. Cheaper and easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Huey
2 years ago
I think option A is the way to go. A third-party provider can bring a fresh perspective and industry-leading expertise to the table.
upvoted 0 times
Tamie
2 years ago
Definitely, having broader experience can help ensure a more comprehensive disaster recovery plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 years ago
I agree, a third party can provide valuable insights that internal stakeholders may not have.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Werner
2 years ago
I think Robot Ltd should enlist the services of a third party for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel