Ah, the age-old question of 'how much is too much?' when it comes to damages. I bet there's an entire legal seminar on that topic alone. Maybe we could just put a 'damages not to exceed a bazillion dollars' clause in the contract and call it a day.
Hmm, I wonder if there's a way to hedge our bets and include both types of damages in the contract? That way, we're covered no matter what happens. Although, I guess that might make the contract a bit... complicated.
Having a clear understanding of the potential risks and consequences can help in determining the best approach for including damages terms in the contract.
Interesting! The example with the power transformer really helps illustrate the difference between the two types of damages. I'll make sure to keep that in mind when drafting a contract.
Ah, I see. So, we need to consider whether the damages are liquidated or unliquidated, and which one applies to the contract. That makes sense, but I wonder how we determine which type is more appropriate in a given situation.
Kristel
1 months agoCarey
3 days agoLeonor
10 days agoJuan
26 days agoBeula
2 months agoNoemi
1 months agoMiss
1 months agoDominga
1 months agoTimmy
2 months agoGayla
Susana
1 months agoFlo
1 months agoAnissa
2 months agoSerita
2 months agoMatthew
2 months agoKristel
2 months agoAmmie
2 months ago