Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L4M8 Topic 6 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M8 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 6
[All L4M8 Questions]

Justify which of the five approaches to condition performance monitoring you think is the most cost effective within whole life asset management.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Emilio
6 days ago
I'm not sure about this 'do nothing' approach. Waiting for things to break down sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. I'll steer clear of that one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
11 days ago
I agree, the 'Proactive' approach seems to be the most cost-effective in the long run. Anything that can help 'harness opportunity' is worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
17 days ago
I see the point, but I still think 'Preventive' approach is also cost-effective as it helps in avoiding unexpected breakdowns.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
18 days ago
The 'Proactive' approach sounds like the way to go. Continuously improving the system to minimize downtime? Sign me up!
upvoted 0 times
Micheline
4 days ago
User 1: I agree, being proactive seems like the best way to prevent downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paulene
19 days ago
I agree with Sherrell. Being proactive can minimize downtime and optimize the system in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
21 days ago
I think the most cost-effective approach is 'Proactive'. It helps in continuous improvement and defect elimination.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel