Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L4M5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion

Where there are high levels of commitment to relationships between both the buyer and supplier, this is seen as collaborative and beneficial to negotiations. Is this statement correct?
B) No, this can be classified as adversarial and C) Yes, characteristics include arm's length transactions and minimal communication
A) Yes, characteristics include risk management and strategic planning
D) No, collaboration does not require commitments from either side

CIPS L4M5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M5 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 4
[All L4M5 Questions]

Where there are high levels of commitment to relationships between both the buyer and supplier, this is seen as collaborative and beneficial to negotiations. Is this statement correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Trust may create value as following:

LO 1, AC 1.4


by Adelina at Mar 02, 2023, 08:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L4M5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Felice
10 months ago
Nah, I think collaboration can happen without deep commitments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
10 months ago
Yes, risk management is key in strong buyer-supplier relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
10 months ago
Surprised to see this, I thought commitment could make things tense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
11 months ago
I don't think that's always true, sometimes it can lead to conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
11 months ago
Totally agree, commitment makes negotiations smoother!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
11 months ago
I thought collaboration needed some level of commitment, so D seems off to me, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think A aligns with the idea of mutual benefits in negotiations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like B could also be a possibility since some relationships can be adversarial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
11 months ago
I remember studying that high commitment leads to better collaboration, so I think A might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to read through the options carefully to figure out the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward Git command to compare two different versions of a repository. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
11 months ago
I think the best strategy here would be to add a calcium channel blocker like Norvasc. That could help lower the blood pressure without disrupting the patient's current regimen too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 year ago
I've got to disagree with B. Adversarial relationships are the last thing you want in a negotiation. A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Nell
1 year ago
A collaborative approach with risk management and strategic planning is key for successful negotiations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 year ago
I think B can lead to a lot of conflicts and misunderstandings in negotiations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
1 year ago
I agree, A is definitely the way to go for successful negotiations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rueben
1 year ago
Haha, C? Arm's length transactions and minimal communication? That's the opposite of collaboration! I'm going with A.
upvoted 0 times
Tomoko
1 year ago
User 3: B) No, this can be classified as adversarial
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
1 year ago
User 2: Magdalene is right, collaboration involves commitment and communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
1 year ago
User 1: A) Yes, characteristics include risk management and strategic planning
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vilma
1 year ago
D? No way! Collaboration definitely requires commitment from both sides. This statement is clearly correct.
upvoted 0 times
Tijuana
1 year ago
B) Yes, characteristics include arm's length transactions and minimal communication
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 year ago
A) No, collaboration definitely requires commitment from both sides
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
B) No, this can be classified as adversarial
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
1 year ago
A) Yes, characteristics include risk management and strategic planning
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 year ago
B) Yes, characteristics include arm's length transactions and minimal communication
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
1 year ago
A) No, collaboration definitely requires commitment from both sides
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
B) No, this can be classified as adversarial
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
1 year ago
A) Yes, characteristics include risk management and strategic planning
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
A) Yes, because commitment to relationships leads to better negotiation outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A. High levels of commitment between buyer and supplier indicate a collaborative and beneficial relationship, not an adversarial one.
upvoted 0 times
Louis
1 year ago
That's right, commitment leads to mutual benefits
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 year ago
Definitely, it shows a strong partnership
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
I agree, collaboration is key in negotiations
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
1 year ago
Yes, characteristics include risk management and strategic planning
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitzie
1 year ago
B) No, this can be classified as adversarial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
1 year ago
A) Yes, characteristics include risk management and strategic planning.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel