Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M5 Exam - Topic 10 Question 91 Discussion

Posted by Linwood on Nov 22, 2025 at 09:49 AM

A procurement manager is preparing for a negotiation with an important supplier. He plans to withhold some crucial information so that his company gains the upper hand in the negotiation. Is this correct when considering using integrative approach to the negotiation?

Suggested Answer: A

:

Integrative negotiation is a negotiation strategy in which the involved parties work together to find a solution that satisfies the needs and concerns of each. This process often involves group brainstorming and creative thinking for individuals to suggest different ideas that benefit both parties.

Compromising is often common in integrative negotiation, and both sides may need to give up certain needs to reach a solution. Honesty can also promote successful integrative negotiation because it can lead to a comprehensive understanding of the issue and what each party needs to be satisfied with the result.


CIPS study guide page 29-31

Integrative Negotiation: Definition, Tips and Examples | Indeed.com

Get Premium L4M5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
ON
Oneida 7 months ago
A) No, integrity is crucial in negotiations.
CA
Cassandra 7 months ago
C) Yes, maximizing gain is key, but it can backfire.
RE
Reid 7 months ago
A) No, honesty builds trust for better long-term relationships.
FR
France 7 months ago
B) Yes, the supplier must know what buyer wants and how to provide that even when the buyer is silent on these matters.
LE
Leonora 7 months ago
A) No, this approach requires honest and open discussion.
VI
Vincenza 8 months ago
C seems harsh, but I guess some companies think that way.
IR
Irene 8 months ago
B is a bit off, the supplier needs to know the essentials.
LA
Lavonna 8 months ago
Wait, isn't it smart to hold back some info?
BA
Bambi 9 months ago
Totally agree with D! Keeping info can backfire big time.
HE
Henriette 9 months ago
A) No, this approach requires honest and open discussion
LE
Levi 9 months ago
Integrative negotiation, huh? Sounds like a fancy way of saying "let's all hold hands and sing Kumbaya."
KA
Kassandra 9 months ago
Holding back information? That's like playing poker with your cards face up. Not a smart move.
LO
Lourdes 9 months ago
B) is the way to go. The supplier should know what the buyer wants, even if the buyer doesn't say it.
DA
Daisy 9 months ago
C) is the best answer. The buyer should maximize their gain, even if it means being dishonest.
MI
Mickie 10 months ago
I guess it could be strategic to hold back some info, but I worry that it might backfire and give the supplier more power, which makes me think option D could be right.
TH
Thurman 10 months ago
I feel like I've seen a similar question before, and it was emphasized that transparency is key in integrative negotiations. So, I lean towards option A as well.
ER
Erick 10 months ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I think option A makes sense since being honest can lead to better outcomes for both parties.
RA
Raylene 10 months ago
I'm a bit torn on this one. Part of me wants to say that the buyer should do whatever it takes to get the best deal, even if that means holding back information. But I also know that the integrative approach is all about building trust and finding creative solutions. I think I'll go with A, but I'm not 100% sure.
LI
Lisha 10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The integrative approach is about collaborating to find mutually beneficial outcomes, not trying to maximize your own gain at the expense of the other party. Withholding information would go against that, so I'm pretty confident A is the right answer here.
FL
Floyd 10 months ago
D) is the correct answer. Withholding information will give the supplier more leverage.
MI
Micaela 11 months ago
I remember studying that integrative negotiation is all about collaboration, so I think withholding information is definitely not the right approach.
BR
Brittney 11 months ago
A) is the correct answer. Integrative negotiation requires open and honest communication.
GE
German 11 months ago
D) No, holding back information will prompt the supplier gain higher negotiation power.
MA
Marshall 11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think the key here is that the integrative approach is all about finding win-win solutions through open and honest communication. Withholding information doesn't really fit with that. I'm leaning towards A, but I'll need to think it through a bit more.
MA
Malcolm 12 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The question seems to be asking about the integrative approach to negotiation, but the answer choices don't seem to align with that. I'll need to review my notes on integrative negotiation to make sure I understand the key principles.
HI
Hillary 6 months ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Definitely, transparency leads to better deals for both sides.
DO
Dottie 6 months ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
If you hold back, the supplier might push back harder.
LA
Latrice 6 months ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Exactly! Withholding info doesn't help build trust.
MI
Misty 7 months ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
I think the integrative approach is all about collaboration.
VA
Vanda 11 months ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Right, honesty is key for a win-win outcome.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel