New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M4 Exam - Topic 3 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M4 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 3
[All L4M4 Questions]

Procurement professionals should never appoint any suppliers that have a low credit rating. Is this statement TRUE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is 'no- quoting in the supplier's currency increases the risk for the buyer'. This questions comes up in a variety of formats in the exam. Remember; if the price is in your own currency (most examples in the exam are given in ) there is less risk than if the prices are quoted in a foreign currency. This is because exchange rates fluctuate; if the price is in you always know what you're paying, if it's in another currency the price can change daily depending on if the exchange rate compared to has gone up or down.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lino
3 months ago
Yeah, but some companies bounce back from low ratings, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
3 months ago
I think it depends on the context, not a black-and-white issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
3 months ago
Wait, are we really saying all low-rated suppliers are bad?
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
4 months ago
Not always true, credit ratings are just one piece of the puzzle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
4 months ago
Definitely agree, low credit ratings can be a red flag!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
4 months ago
I recall that a low credit rating doesn't always mean a supplier is about to go bankrupt, so I think B makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think saying "never" is too strong. Maybe C is the right choice since there are other factors to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question, and I leaned towards B because credit ratings are just one part of the financial picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
5 months ago
I remember discussing how credit ratings can be misleading, so I think the answer might be B or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure if a low credit rating is enough on its own to disqualify a supplier. There might be more to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards D. If a supplier has a low credit rating, that seems like a clear sign that they're at risk of insolvency or going out of business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is B. A credit rating is just one tool, and there could be other ways to assess a supplier's financial competence.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think a low credit rating could indicate financial issues, but there might be other factors to consider as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The credit rating seems like an important factor, but I'm not convinced it should be the only consideration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
10 months ago
If my credit score was as low as my bank balance, I'd be doomed too. Glad procurement has more sophisticated tools than my wallet!
upvoted 0 times
Zana
9 months ago
C) No, because a credit rating is not an appropriate decision-making tool
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
9 months ago
B) No, because a credit rating is only one financial tool to be used in determining financial competence
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
9 months ago
A) Yes, because this rating indicates poor financial management practices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawna
10 months ago
A is too simplistic. Financial management isn't black and white. B captures the nuance required for this question.
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
9 months ago
C) No, because a credit rating is not an appropriate decision-making tool
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
10 months ago
B) No, because a credit rating is only one financial tool to be used in determining financial competence
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
10 months ago
A) Yes, because this rating indicates poor financial management practices
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavera
10 months ago
C is just plain wrong. Credit ratings may not be perfect, but they're a useful tool in the procurement process. B is the sensible choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Tonette
9 months ago
A) Yes, poor financial management can lead to risks in the procurement process
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
9 months ago
B) No, credit ratings are important but not the only factor to consider
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
9 months ago
A) Yes, because this rating indicates poor financial management practices
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
10 months ago
B) No, because a credit rating is only one financial tool to be used in determining financial competence
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
10 months ago
D is tempting, but a low credit rating doesn't necessarily mean imminent insolvency. There could be other factors at play. B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Lon
10 months ago
A) Yes, because this rating indicates poor financial management practices
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
10 months ago
B) No, because a credit rating is only one financial tool to be used in determining financial competence
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Belen
10 months ago
The correct answer is B. A credit rating is just one factor to consider, not the sole basis for supplier selection. You need to look at the bigger financial picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
11 months ago
I agree with Marica, we should consider other factors too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
11 months ago
I disagree, a credit rating is just one tool to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
11 months ago
I think the statement is TRUE.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel