Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L4M3 Topic 7 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M3 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 7
[All L4M3 Questions]

Southwark is negotiating a contract with Orchard to provide software and IT services. Orchard will manufacture and install the products which are contractually supplied by IBM. Southwark's procurement manager is worried that during the contract there would be some problems that they would not able to claim for damages from Orchard. Which of the following should be included in the head contract so that Southward can sue IBM, should the need arise?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Advantages of using fixed pricing arrangement are as below:

- Budget/income certainty - prices are fixed up front and should not change

- The impact of changes to the supplier's cost base is not fed through to the purchaser. If costs diminish, the supplier will benefit from this, and if costs rise, the purchaser will benefit


LO 3, AC 3.3

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lisha
2 days ago
I believe negligence should also be included, just to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
3 days ago
I'm not sure about the collateral warranty deed, that sounds a bit shady. Better stick with the classic indemnity clause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
4 days ago
I agree with Twana. Indemnity will protect us in case of any damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
7 days ago
Indemnity seems like the obvious choice here. If Southwark can't claim damages from Orchard, they need a way to go after IBM directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
17 days ago
I think we should include indemnity in the head contract.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel