New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M3 Exam - Topic 7 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M3 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 7
[All L4M3 Questions]

Which of the following is set down in statute as a liability that exists without any need to prove fault?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

IMechE/IET: Institution of Mechanical Engineers/Institution of Engineering and Technology - two separate institutes that issue jointly agreed model forms covering the design, supply and installation of electrical, electronic and mechanical plant including special conditions for the ancillary development of software. Car lifts are mechanical products, so IMechE/IET is the most suitable model contract for this type of product.

FIDIC is a French language acronym for Fdration Internationale Des Ingnieurs-Conseils, which means the international federation of consulting engineers. It was started in 1913 by the trio of France, Belgium and Switzerland. The United Kingdom joined the Federation in 1949. FIDIC is headquartered in Switzerland and now boasts of membership from over 60 different countries. FIDIC published its first contract, titled The Form of contract for works of Civil Engineering construction, in 1957. As the title indicated, this first contract was aimed at the Civil Engineering sector and it soon became known for the colour of its cover, and thus, The Red Book. It has become the tradition that FIDIC contracts are known in popular parlance by the colour of their cover. This first contract by FIDIC was undertaken jointly with the International federation of Building and Public works. FIDIC's concerted effort at achieving broad consultation and acceptance of its contract forms has seen subsequent editions of its contracts being ratified by the International Federation of Asian and Western Pacific Contractors Association, Associated General Contractors of America and the Inter-American Federation of the Construction Industry, Multilateral Development Banks among others. Because of the broad support it enjoys, FIDIC contracts are the foremost contracts in international construction.

The Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply (CIPS) has some model contracts for IT functions including: supply and installation of computer equipment, support and maintenance of bespoke software, servicing of computer equipment,...

The International Trade Centre (ITC) produces contracts specifically designed for small companies doing international business, covering the sale of goods, distribution, services and joint ventures.


LO 3, AC 3.1

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Cyndy
3 months ago
Non-current liability doesn't fit here at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
3 months ago
Wait, is strict liability really without proving fault? That sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
4 months ago
Definitely strict liability, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
4 months ago
I thought it was contingent liability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
4 months ago
Strict liability is the answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
4 months ago
I definitely remember that strict liability is about liability without fault, but I hope I’m not mixing it up with non-current liabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
4 months ago
I’m torn between strict liability and contingent liability. I feel like I’ve seen both terms used, but I can’t recall which one is set in statute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about liabilities, and strict liability was mentioned as a key concept. It seems to fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
5 months ago
I think strict liability is the right answer because it’s the only one that doesn’t require proving fault, but I’m not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused by the part about not being able to return to this question. I'll need to make sure I understand the implications of that before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
5 months ago
I remember practicing with a question similar to this, and I think VPNv4 was one of the answers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different subnet mask options. I'll need to carefully calculate the subnet and network address to determine the right command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. We just added a new directory to be exported, so we need to make that available to clients. I'm leaning towards D - systemctl restart nfsserver.service, since that will restart the entire NFS server and pick up the new export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure deleted images need to be manually carved out, since they're not stored in the normal file system. I'll make sure to remember that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
I've got this! The answer is clearly B - buying a proper fire insurance policy. That's a proactive measure to protect against the consequences of a fire, not a repressive one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
10 months ago
Strict liability? Sounds like a liability that's always on the hook, no matter what. Although, I guess that's better than having to prove fault. Hmm, tough call.
upvoted 0 times
Hortencia
8 months ago
B) Current liability
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
8 months ago
B) Current liability
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
9 months ago
Yeah, strict liability means you're responsible no matter what.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
9 months ago
Yeah, strict liability means you're responsible no matter what.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
9 months ago
A) Strict liability
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
9 months ago
A) Strict liability
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
10 months ago
Strict liability? That's the one where you're responsible even if it wasn't your fault, right? Guess that's the liability version of 'the buck stops here'.
upvoted 0 times
Yolande
8 months ago
So, strict liability is like a safety net for potential risks and damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
8 months ago
Exactly, it's a way to ensure accountability even without proving negligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
8 months ago
It's like saying 'you break it, you buy it' in the legal world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
9 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Strict liability means you're responsible regardless of fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
9 months ago
So, strict liability is like a safety net for situations where fault is hard to determine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
9 months ago
Exactly, it's a way to ensure accountability even when fault is not proven.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
9 months ago
Exactly, it's a way to ensure accountability even when fault is not proven.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
9 months ago
It's like saying 'you break it, you buy it' in the legal world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
9 months ago
It's like saying 'you break it, you buy it' in the legal world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
10 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Strict liability means you can be held responsible regardless of fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
10 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Strict liability means you are responsible regardless of fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francoise
10 months ago
Strict liability, eh? Sounds a bit too 'strict' for my liking. I'll take my chances with the other options, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
10 months ago
Strict liability, huh? Guess that's the liability version of 'guilty until proven innocent'. A bit harsh, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's A) Strict liability because it doesn't require proving fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
10 months ago
Strict liability? Sounds like a liability that's always on the hook, no matter what. No need to prove fault? I like the sound of that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
10 months ago
I agree with Harris, strict liability makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Strict liability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel