New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M3 Exam - Topic 2 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M3 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 2
[All L4M3 Questions]

To check whether supplier actually complies with the labour standards set out in the contract, the purchaser should have...?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Many firms have compliance policies for suppliers in place. To ensure that the supplier actually comply with the standards set out, the purchaser can employ the right to audit. The buyer usually obtains the right to examine records of a vendor to determine if a fraud or a violation of company policy has occurred through the following methods:

- Right-to-audit agreement The agreement can be printed on the back of a purchase order, contract, or other procurement form.

- A simple request If the right-to-audit agreement wasn't included on the procurement form, and the buyer suspects irregularities, he may have to beg the vendor to allow an audit to be performed. If the buyer is a major customer of the vendor, the buyer may be able to wield a big enough stick to obtain permission to look at the records.

- Right-to-audit Pitfalls


- CIPS study guide page 160

- Reserving the Right to Audit the Suspicious Vendor: Right-to-audit clauses in vendor contracts help control fraud and abuse by affording discovery devices in examinations.

LO 3, AC 3.2

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Annice
15 hours ago
I agree with C, but D could be necessary in severe cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
6 days ago
Wait, can they really just terminate the contract? Seems extreme!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
11 days ago
Right to audit (C) is essential for transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
16 days ago
I think A and B are too harsh. We should focus on improvement, not punishment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
21 days ago
C is definitely the most practical option. Audits are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
26 days ago
C) Right of audit. Audits are the way to go - gotta make sure those suppliers are keeping it real. Can't have any monkey business going on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
1 month ago
C) Right of audit. Audits are the way to go - gotta keep those suppliers on their toes! Can't have them slacking off, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
1 month ago
C) Right of audit. Audits are the way to go - can't just take their word for it, gotta see it for yourself. Wouldn't want any funny business going on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
1 month ago
C) Right of audit. Gotta keep an eye on those suppliers, am I right? Audits are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
2 months ago
C) Right of audit. Audits are the way to go - don't want any shady business going on with those suppliers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
2 months ago
C) Right of audit. Seems like the most logical choice to me. Can't just trust them to follow the rules, gotta verify!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
2 months ago
I'd go with C. Auditing is the best way to ensure compliance. Gotta keep those suppliers honest!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
2 months ago
Rescinding the contract seems extreme; I wonder if the right of audit is more appropriate for checking compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
2 months ago
Definitely C. Auditing is the way to go - can't just take their word for it, gotta see it for yourself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards the right to terminate the contract, but I feel like there might be nuances I missed in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leana
3 months ago
C) Right of audit is the correct answer. Gotta keep those suppliers in check!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
3 months ago
C) Right of audit. Audits are the way to go - gotta make sure those suppliers are playing by the rules. Can't just trust them, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
3 months ago
I remember a practice question about contract compliance, and I think the right to penalise the supplier was mentioned as a possible answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
3 months ago
I think the right to audit might be the best option here, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only thing needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The right to penalise or terminate the contract feels too harsh just for checking compliance. The right of audit seems like the most logical choice, but I'm not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
4 months ago
The right of audit is definitely the way to go. That gives the purchaser a clear mechanism to verify compliance without resorting to drastic measures right away. Seems like the most reasonable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
4 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure - the right to terminate or rescind the contract seems a bit extreme if the goal is just to check compliance. Maybe the right of audit is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
4 months ago
I think the right of audit is the best approach here. That gives the purchaser a way to actively check compliance without immediately terminating the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel