New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M1 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 4
[All L4M1 Questions]

What is meant by Stakeholder Mapping? Describe a tool that can be used by a Procurement Professional to map the stakeholders at their organisation (25 points)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

How to approach this question:

- Define stakeholder mapping -- completing an analysis of the stakeholders of an organisation and dividing them into categories depending on certain characteristics. This is often represented visually on a graph or matrix.

- Describe a Stakeholder mapping tool -- the most common tool is Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix so I would recommend using this one. It is explained in detail in the study guide. However, the question is open so you could choose to describe another tool such as Edgar's Stakeholder Position Analysis if you so wished. You wouldn't be wrong choosing this, but honestly, I'd just go for Mendelow. You can't go wrong with Mendelow. Because the Matrix has 4 sections you can imagine you'd get 5 points for the definition of stakeholder mapping, and 5 points for each of the quadrants of the matrix.

Essay Plan:

Introduction - The reason why stakeholder mapping is important is because interests and expectations of stakeholder groups will be different and possibly conflicting. Mapping this allows an organisation to see the variety and decide on an appropriate management style for each stakeholder group.

Paragraph 1 - Mendelow's Power / Interest Matrix maps stakeholders based on their influencing power and the strength of their motivation to use that power. It uses a 2x2 grid and defines power as high or low and interest and high or low. It then provides four strategies for managing the stakeholders based on which quadrant of the grid the stakeholder falls into. These 4 categories are:

Paragraph 2 - Keep satisfied -- high power but low interest. If the stakeholder becomes dissatisfied or concerned their interest may peak. Examples include regulatory bodies, shareholders, senior management. The best approach is to keep them up to date so they are informed of what is going on, but do not burden them with information they do not need.

Paragraph 3 - Manage Closely -- AKA Key players -- includes major customers, key suppliers, partners, senior management. These stakeholders need to know everything that is going on and approve of what is going on. The recommended strategy is early involvement and participation, and integrating their goals with yours. This group requires regular communication and meetings. You should take their opinions on board.

Paragraph 4- Monitor -- minimum effort required -- this is the low priority group as they have low power and low interest. Includes small volume suppliers and other organisational functions with no direct interest in your activities. This group does not need to receive regular communication.

Paragraph 5 - Keep informed - high interest, but low power. If they're not kept in the loop and understand the need for decisions, they may lobby together to protect their interest if they feel threatened. Employee groups, suppliers and community groups may be in this category. This group should receive regular communication.

Conclusion - Mendelow created the matrix in 1991 and it is still used today. It is a popular management tool due to its simplicity. It's important to notes that stakeholders can move through the matrix- it isn't stagnant. For example, at the beginning of a project a manager in another department may be classed as 'low priority' because they are seen to have no interest and no power in the project. However, as the project progresses the manager may become interested. They will then transfer into the keep informed category. Therefore, the matrix should be redone regularly throughout the lifetime of a project to capture any movements. The matrix should also be redone for each individual project -- it cannot be assumed that a stakeholder who had interest in one project would be interested in another.

Tutor Notes

- The above essay plan is basically the entire essay, I got carried away. The only thing you'd need to add into that is an example of a stakeholder for each of the sections! (e.g. the CEO is high power, but low interest stakeholder for the procurement department. He/ She doesn't care about the day to day operations but should be kept informed of any big news). For your examples you could use your own place of work.

- At level 4 you don't have to analyse the model, you just have to be able to memorise it and repeat it. Mendelow comes up again at Level 5 and 6 in a bit more detail. If you want to score super bonus points you could mention in your conclusion that the main disadvantage of Mendelow's Matrix is that it doesn't take into consideration the stakeholder's position on the project -- whether they're for it or against it. Therefore, it doesn't provide the full picture or provide much help on how to manage stakeholders. E.g. two stakeholders might both be in 'manage closely' section, but one is for the project and the other against -- they'd need to be handled very differently!

- Study guide p. 65


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Dusti
3 months ago
Wait, how does that actually help in decision-making?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
3 months ago
You can use a power-interest grid to map stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
3 months ago
Really? I thought it was just a fancy term for a contact list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
4 months ago
Totally agree, it's essential for effective communication!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
4 months ago
Stakeholder mapping helps identify and analyze key players in a project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
4 months ago
I vaguely remember a tool called a stakeholder analysis chart. It seems like it could help visualize relationships, but I need to double-check how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
4 months ago
I feel like there was a case study where we applied stakeholder mapping, but I can't recall the exact steps we took. Was it something like a matrix?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
4 months ago
I think we talked about using a power-interest grid for mapping stakeholders. It helps prioritize them based on their influence and interest, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
5 months ago
I remember stakeholder mapping is about identifying and analyzing the interests of different parties involved in a project, but I'm not sure how to describe the specific tool we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
5 months ago
Okay, stakeholder mapping - I remember learning about this in one of my procurement classes. It's all about identifying the key people or groups who have a stake in the procurement activities and understanding their level of influence and interest. For the tool, maybe something like a matrix or grid that plots the stakeholders based on those two factors? That could help visualize where to focus your efforts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
5 months ago
Stakeholder mapping sounds like a useful tool for a procurement professional. I'm thinking I'd start by making a list of all the key stakeholders - things like the procurement team, end users, finance, IT, etc. Then I'd try to analyze each stakeholder's level of power/influence and their level of interest in the procurement process. That should help me prioritize who to focus on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
5 months ago
Hmm, stakeholder mapping is a new concept for me. I'll need to think through how to approach this. Maybe I can start by brainstorming all the different people or teams that could be impacted by procurement decisions in our organization. Then I'll need to figure out how to assess their level of influence and interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
5 months ago
I think I've got a good handle on stakeholder mapping. It's about identifying the key people or groups who have a stake in the procurement process, right? I'd probably start by listing out all the potential stakeholders and then try to categorize them based on their level of influence and interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
1 year ago
Stakeholder Mapping? Sounds like a way to make a simple task overly complicated. Just ask everyone who they are and be done with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 year ago
Stakeholder Mapping is like a corporate treasure hunt, but with more paperwork and less adventure. Where's the fun in that?
upvoted 0 times
Marshall
1 year ago
The tool I use is a Power/Interest Grid to prioritize stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
1 year ago
Yes, it can help with communication and decision-making.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
I think it's important to know who has influence in the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
1 year ago
Stakeholder mapping helps identify key players in a project.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mariann
1 year ago
Stakeholder Mapping? Isn't that just drawing a fancy diagram and calling it a day? I bet the Procurement Pro could use a dartboard for that.
upvoted 0 times
Apolonia
1 year ago
The tool helps classify stakeholders based on their level of power and interest in the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
A Procurement Professional could use a Power/Interest Grid tool for mapping stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
1 year ago
It involves identifying and analyzing the stakeholders involved in a project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
1 year ago
Stakeholder mapping is more than just drawing a diagram.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dalene
1 year ago
I think a tool like a Power/Interest Grid can be used by a Procurement Professional to map stakeholders. It helps categorize stakeholders based on their level of power and interest in the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
1 year ago
Stakeholder mapping is identifying and analyzing the individuals or groups that have an interest in a project.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel