Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 82 Discussion

Posted by Nana on Apr 06, 2026 at 11:57 PM

C Ltd is a private, family-owned company which is hoping to become listed on a recognised Stock Exchange within the next two years. At the moment, the Board of Directors comprises five directors; four of whom are from the founding family and all of whom are involved in the day-to-day running of the business. The remaining director obtained a seat on the Board threeyearsagoas a condition of an investment by a venture capital fund.

The Board meets in half-day sessionsonce a fortnight and the Board meetings are reasonably well run. All decisions are taken by the Board as a whole. There are no sub-committees.

Which of the following steps would it be appropriate for C Ltd to take in the light of the proposed listing?

Suggested Answer: A, B, D

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
20 comments · newest first
YU
Yuki 1 month ago
I disagree, option C could protect C Ltd's interests.
WA
Wade 1 month ago
I feel like removing the venture capital director is risky.
CH
Chuck 2 months ago
True, but they need independent voices first. NEDs are key.
ZE
Zena 2 months ago
But what about option D? Sub-committees could improve focus.
PA
Patrick 2 months ago
Agreed, option A makes sense. It balances the board.
DE
Denny 2 months ago
I think they should appoint independent NEDs. It's crucial for transparency.
EL
Eleonore 2 months ago
A Chair from the NEDs would bring fresh perspective!
JU
Julio 2 months ago
10-year contracts for execs? Sounds risky to me.
SH
Sharika 3 months ago
Surprised they haven't set up sub-committees yet!
SE
Selene 3 months ago
I disagree, the venture capital guy adds value.
KE
Kendra 3 months ago
They definitely need more independent NEDs for the listing.
DO
Dominic 3 months ago
Sub-committees are essential for good governance, no doubt!
XU
Xuan 3 months ago
Wait, 10-year contracts? That sounds risky!
MA
Maryln 4 months ago
Removing the venture capital director seems extreme, though.
TE
Teri 5 months ago
Totally agree, at least 50% NEDs is a must!
KA
Kate 5 months ago
They definitely need more independent NEDs for a proper listing.
JE
Jesus 6 months ago
I feel like giving the executive directors long contracts, like in option E, might not be the best move. It could tie the company down too much, but I need to think more about that.
RO
Roxanne 6 months ago
Setting up sub-committees like in option D was something we practiced in case studies. It could really help with the structure, especially for a company looking to go public.
GA
Gail 6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about the necessity of removing the venture capital director. I think they might still have valuable insights, but I guess it depends on their influence.
DE
Deja 6 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having independent NEDs for better governance, so option A seems like a solid choice.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel