Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA19-F02-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-F02-1 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA19-F02-1 Questions]

ST granted 1,000 share appreciation rights (SARs) to its 100 employees on 1 December 20X7. To be eligible, employees must remain employed for 3 years from the grant date.In the year to 30 November 20X8, 10 staff left and a further 20 were expected to leave over the following two years. The fair value of each SAR was $12 at 1 December 20X7 and $15 at 30 November 20X8.

What is the accounting entry to record this transaction for the year to 30 November 20X8?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Precious
5 months ago
So, is it really $280,000? That seems low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
Definitely not B, that doesn't make sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
5 months ago
Wait, how do we account for the staff leaving?
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
5 months ago
I think the correct entry is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
6 months ago
The fair value of SARs increased from $12 to $15.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
6 months ago
I think the total expense should be based on the number of employees remaining, but I can't recall if we should use the fair value at the grant date or the current fair value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
6 months ago
I feel like the answer should involve the fair value at the grant date, but I'm confused about whether to credit liabilities or equity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
6 months ago
This question reminds me of a similar practice one we did on share-based payments. I think we need to consider the vesting period and the number of employees still eligible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
6 months ago
I remember we discussed how to calculate the total expense based on the fair value of the SARs, but I'm not sure about the impact of the employees leaving.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the terminology here. I'll need to review my notes on MVPN before I can confidently answer this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
6 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this. Based on the information provided, it seems clear that the issue is a delivery gap where the staff are failing to provide the "quick, in-and-out service" that was promised. I'll select D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the best approach to ensure IT governance is adopted consistently across the enterprise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. What exactly do they mean by "supporting geographically disparate users"? I'll need to read it over a few times to make sure I understand the context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
11 months ago
Ah, the joys of share appreciation rights. It's like a treasure hunt, but instead of finding gold, you're trying to find the right accounting entry. Good thing I have my trusty calculator and a sense of humor!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
11 months ago
This is just like the time I had to explain compound interest to my grandma. Accounting can be a real brain-teaser, but at least it's not as bad as trying to figure out how to split the dinner bill with friends!
upvoted 0 times
Yasuko
10 months ago
C) Dr Staff costs $280,000, Cr Non-current liabilities $280,000
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
10 months ago
B) Dr Staff costs $350,000, Cr Equity $350,000
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
10 months ago
A) Dr Staff costs $350,000, Cr Non-current liabilities $350,000
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
11 months ago
Alright, time to channel my inner accountant! I'm going with option D, since it seems to match the information provided in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe I should have paid more attention in my accounting classes. This question is making my head spin!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
11 months ago
Wait, why are we recording a liability? Isn't this a share appreciation rights plan? I think option B is the right answer, where the expense is recorded in equity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
11 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The question mentions that the fair value of each SAR increased from $12 to $15, so the total liability should be $280,000 (20 employees x $15 per SAR).
upvoted 0 times
Avery
10 months ago
Option C: Dr Staff costs $280,000, Cr Non-current liabilities $280,000
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
10 months ago
So, the total liability should be $280,000 for the 20 employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
10 months ago
I agree, the fair value of each SAR increased to $15.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
10 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickolas
12 months ago
Why do you think it's C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
12 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
1 year ago
Because the total cost of SARs granted should be recognized as staff costs, not as a liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
1 year ago
Why do you think it's C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel