Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA19-E02-1 Exam - Topic 5 Question 118 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-E02-1 exam
Question #: 118
Topic #: 5
[All CIMAPRA19-E02-1 Questions]

A Company achieves its competitive advantage by adopting a positioning view to strategy setting.

Which TWO of the technical models below are most suited to this approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jamie
26 days ago
A and C give clear insights into competitive advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
1 month ago
B is useful too, but not as much for positioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 month ago
I agree, Porter's models really focus on competition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
1 month ago
Totally agree with A and C! Solid choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
2 months ago
Wait, I thought PESTEL was more about external factors?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
2 months ago
A and C make sense, but what about D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
2 months ago
I think B is important too, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
2 months ago
Haha, Resource Audit? Might as well throw in SWOT analysis while we're at it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 months ago
Resource Audit? Really? That's not even close to the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
2 months ago
I agree, Porter's models are perfect for this positioning approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
3 months ago
The Resource Audit could also be important, but I feel like it’s more about internal resources rather than positioning in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
3 months ago
I remember practicing with the Five Forces model, and it seems relevant because it helps analyze industry competition, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
3 months ago
A and C are the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
3 months ago
I think A and C are the best choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
4 months ago
PESTEL is more for the external environment, not positioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
4 months ago
Definitely A and C! Those fit perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
4 months ago
I'm not so sure about PESTEL analysis being a good fit for positioning. It seems more about external factors rather than competitive advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
4 months ago
I think Michael Porter's Value Chain is definitely one of the models since it focuses on internal activities that can create value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
4 months ago
The Value Chain and Resource Audit seem more focused on internal capabilities, so I don't think they'd be the best fit for a positioning approach. I'd choose the Five Forces and PESTEL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
5 months ago
For a positioning strategy, I'd go with the Five Forces model and PESTEL. Those frameworks help analyze the industry landscape and competitive environment, which is key for positioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Value Chain and Five Forces model are both Porter frameworks, but I'm not sure how they relate to a positioning approach to strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
I think Porter's Five Forces model and PESTEL analysis would be the most relevant here, since they focus on the external environment and industry positioning.
upvoted 0 times
Van
2 days ago
Both models give a solid view of the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
7 days ago
PESTEL helps with external factors too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
3 months ago
I agree, Five Forces is key for understanding competition.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel