Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CFA Institute Sustainable-Investing Exam - Topic 7 Question 3 Discussion

Which of the following actions seeks to avoid exploitation of minority shareholders?
B) Granting pre-emption rights
A) Issuing dual-class shares
C) Promoting 'general mandate' resolutions

CFA Institute Sustainable-Investing Exam - Topic 7 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's Sustainable-Investing exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 7
[All Sustainable-Investing Questions]

Which of the following actions seeks to avoid exploitation of minority shareholders?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Odette at Aug 15, 2025, 01:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sustainable-Investing Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Johna
8 months ago
C seems like a stretch. How does that help minority shareholders?
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
8 months ago
I’m not so sure about B. Can pre-emption rights really prevent exploitation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
8 months ago
Totally agree with B! It's all about giving them a fair chance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
9 months ago
Wait, isn't A also a way to protect them? Dual-class shares can be tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
9 months ago
B is the right choice! Pre-emption rights protect minority shareholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the general mandate resolutions. Do they really relate to protecting minority shareholders, or are they more about management flexibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
10 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice question we did on shareholder rights. I feel like pre-emption rights were emphasized as a protective measure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about dual-class shares potentially leading to exploitation rather than preventing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
10 months ago
I think granting pre-emption rights is the right answer because it allows existing shareholders to maintain their ownership percentage and avoid dilution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
10 months ago
I feel like I should know this, but I'm drawing a blank. Time to review my notes on corporate governance and shareholder protections. Gotta make sure I get this one right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
10 months ago
Okay, let me see. Issuing dual-class shares gives more voting power to insiders, so that's not it. And 'general mandate' resolutions could potentially be used to exploit minority shareholders. I'm leaning towards B, but I want to double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know pre-emption rights help protect minority shareholders, but I'm not confident that's the best answer here. I'll have to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
11 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is B - granting pre-emption rights to minority shareholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
11 months ago
Issuing dual-class shares? That's like giving the boss a megaphone and telling the employees to use a tin can. Not very minority-friendly, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
11 months ago
B) Pre-emption rights, that's the smart choice. Gotta look out for the little fish in the big pond.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
11 months ago
C) Promoting \'general mandate\' resolutions? Sounds like a recipe for shady business if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
11 months ago
But what about promoting 'general mandate' resolutions? Could that also help prevent exploitation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
11 months ago
A) Issuing dual-class shares? Nah, that's just asking for trouble. The minority holders need a fair shake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
11 months ago
I agree with Kerrie, pre-emption rights protect minority shareholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
11 months ago
B) Granting pre-emption rights, that's the way to go! Protects the little guys from getting left behind.
upvoted 0 times
Gregoria
8 months ago
Pre-emption rights really level the playing field!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
8 months ago
Yes! They give minority shareholders a voice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
8 months ago
Totally agree! Pre-emption rights are essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
9 months ago
Dual-class shares can be risky for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerrie
1 year ago
I think granting pre-emption rights is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel