A user is having an issue where the Utilization report has inflated hours. The billable hours, calendar hours, and credited hours are double their actual values.
Which of the following is a possible cause of this issue?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium PSA-Sysadmin Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
28 comments · newest first
AS
Asuncion
10 months ago
Grouping by Resource seems less likely to cause this issue.
DE
Delfina
11 months ago
Wait, are the hours really double? That sounds weird.
NA
Nathan
11 months ago
Could be the Time Period Type too, though.
JE
Jenifer
11 months ago
Agree, that’s a common mistake!
MA
Marcelle
11 months ago
I think it's definitely the End Date filter.
IS
Isaac
12 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to adjust filters. I think option A could definitely be a factor here.
SO
Son
12 months ago
I feel like filtering by Time Period Type could be relevant too. It might be option C, but I can't recall the specifics.
AN
Annelle
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think grouping by Resource could help clarify the hours. That sounds like option B, right?
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how incorrect date ranges can really mess up reports. Maybe option A is the right choice?
SH
Shelia
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. If the billable, calendar, and credited hours are all doubled, that suggests a more systemic issue. I'd look into the time tracking or data import processes to see if there's a bug or misconfiguration causing the duplication.
MA
Mayra
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The question mentions the hours are doubled, so I'm wondering if it could be a problem with the underlying data or calculations rather than just the report settings.
DE
Dewitt
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward issue with the report configuration. I'd start by double-checking the date range and filters to ensure they're capturing the correct data.
DI
Diego
1 year ago
I'd go with option B and try grouping the report by resource. That might help identify if the issue is isolated to certain users or teams. It's a good starting point to narrow down the problem.
AI
Ailene
1 year ago
I feel pretty confident that the performance improvement claim seems high at six times, but does that come with the mentioned cost reduction? I think I've practiced something similar!
TA
Tammi
2 years ago
The report filter is definitely the way to go. Adjusting the dates is like turning it off and back on again - the classic IT troubleshooting trick!
FR
Francesco
2 years ago
Double the hours? Sounds like someone's been clocking in some serious overtime, if you ask me. Maybe they're trying to pad their paycheck, huh?
NE
Nettie
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Grouping by Resource or filtering by Time Period Type could also be worth a look. Gotta cover all the bases, you know?
QU
Quentin
2 years ago
C) The report needs to be filtered by Time Period Type
TA
Tayna
2 years ago
B) The report needs to be grouped by Resource
MA
Margurite
2 years ago
A) The report filter for 'End Date' needs to be edited to a different date range
GL
Glen
2 years ago
I agree with Tesha. Modifying the date range filter is the most straightforward solution to this problem.
TE
Tesha
2 years ago
The report filter for 'End Date' seems like the most logical option to me. Adjusting the date range should fix the inflated hours issue.
RE
Reita
2 years ago
C) The report needs to be filtered by Time Period Type
HA
Haydee
2 years ago
B) The report needs to be grouped by Resource
GA
Gayla
2 years ago
A) The report filter for 'End Date' needs to be edited to a different date range
YO
Yolando
2 years ago
I believe the report should be filtered by Time Period Type to fix the inflated hours issue.
AN
Annamae
2 years ago
I agree with Stevie. Editing the 'End Date' filter could solve the problem.
ST
Stevie
2 years ago
I think the issue might be with the report filter for 'End Date'.