Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 6 Question 54 Discussion

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?#include #include using namespace std;class A{int a,b;public:A & operator =(const A & c) { a = c.a; return *this;}A():a(0),b(0){}void setA(int a) {this?>a = a;} void setB(int b) {this?>b = b;}int getA() {return a;} int getB() {return b;}};int main (){vectorv;A a;a.setA(10); a.setB(11);v.push_back(a);A b = v.front(); v.pop_back();cout
A) program outputs 11 10
B) compilation error
C) program outputs 0 10
D) program outputs 10 0
E) program outputs 11 0

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 6 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPP exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 6
[All CPP Questions]

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?

#include

#include

using namespace std;

class A

{

int a,b;

public:

A & operator =(const A & c) { a = c.a; return *this;}

A():a(0),b(0){}

void setA(int a) {this?>a = a;} void setB(int b) {this?>b = b;}

int getA() {return a;} int getB() {return b;}

};

int main ()

{

vectorv;

A a;

a.setA(10); a.setB(11);

v.push_back(a);

A b = v.front(); v.pop_back();

cout<

return 0;

}

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Aja at Aug 21, 2022, 07:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ben
8 months ago
I agree, that operator overload is fine, but the syntax is wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
9 months ago
Wait, is that really how you set values? Seems off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
9 months ago
Definitely a compilation error, can't use '?>' like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 months ago
I think it should output 11 10 if it compiles!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
9 months ago
Looks like a compilation error due to the 'this?>a' syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
9 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, the compilation error, but I also recall that if it compiles, it should output the values set in the object.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to check the output of a vector with custom objects. I feel like it should output 11 10, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
9 months ago
I think there might be a compilation error because of the `this?>a` syntax in the setter methods. That looks wrong to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
9 months ago
I remember something about the operator overloading, but I'm not sure if the assignment operator is implemented correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking for the other command, not the rolemod command. So the answer must be one of the auditconfig options. B looks like the best fit - it sets the audit policy to capture the executed commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully to make sure I choose the right components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
10 months ago
I think we need to ensure redundancy is maintained while upgrading, but I'm not clear on whether we should upgrade APICs first or go for the leaf switches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
10 months ago
The key here is understanding how the Cisco WSA processes identification profiles. I think the answer is D - AsyncOS processes them alphabetically, but I'll double-check that in my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
10 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy for this. I'll eliminate the options I'm sure are wrong, then make an educated guess on the remaining one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel